Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Artin-Schreier-Witt extensions and ramification breaks

G. Griffith Elder, Kevin Keating

TL;DR

The paper addresses the ramification structure of Artin–Schreier–Witt extensions K_n/K over a local field K of characteristic p with perfect residue field, constructing these extensions from a Witt vector a∈W_n(K) by solving F(a)=a. It develops a direct, self-contained method to compute the upper ramification breaks in terms of valuations m_i=−v_K(a_i), extending prior finite-residue-field results to arbitrary perfect residue fields by reducing to strongly reduced Witt vectors and applying induction on n. The main contribution is the explicit formula u_i = max{ p^{i−1} m_0, ..., p m_{i−2}, m_{i−1} } for i=1,…,n, with clear compatibility with subextensions and quotients. This provides a concrete description of ramification in Artin–Schreier–Witt towers and has implications for explicit class field theory in characteristic p.

Abstract

Let $K=k((t))$ be a local field of characteristic $p>0$, with perfect residue field $k$. Let $\vec{a}=(a_0,a_1,\dots,a_{n-1})\in W_n(K)$ be a Witt vector of length $n$. Artin-Schreier-Witt theory associates to $\vec{a}$ a cyclic extension $L/K$ of degree $p^i$ for some $i\le n$. Assume that the vector $\vec{a}$ is ``reduced'', and that $v_K(a_0)<0$; then $L/K$ is a totally ramified extension of degree $p^n$. In the case where $k$ is finite, Kanesaka-Sekiguchi and Thomas used class field theory to explicitly compute the upper ramification breaks of $L/K$ in terms of the valuations of the components of $\vec{a}$. In this note we use a direct method to show that these formulas remain valid when $k$ is an arbitrary perfect field.

Artin-Schreier-Witt extensions and ramification breaks

TL;DR

The paper addresses the ramification structure of Artin–Schreier–Witt extensions K_n/K over a local field K of characteristic p with perfect residue field, constructing these extensions from a Witt vector a∈W_n(K) by solving F(a)=a. It develops a direct, self-contained method to compute the upper ramification breaks in terms of valuations m_i=−v_K(a_i), extending prior finite-residue-field results to arbitrary perfect residue fields by reducing to strongly reduced Witt vectors and applying induction on n. The main contribution is the explicit formula u_i = max{ p^{i−1} m_0, ..., p m_{i−2}, m_{i−1} } for i=1,…,n, with clear compatibility with subextensions and quotients. This provides a concrete description of ramification in Artin–Schreier–Witt towers and has implications for explicit class field theory in characteristic p.

Abstract

Let be a local field of characteristic , with perfect residue field . Let be a Witt vector of length . Artin-Schreier-Witt theory associates to a cyclic extension of degree for some . Assume that the vector is ``reduced'', and that ; then is a totally ramified extension of degree . In the case where is finite, Kanesaka-Sekiguchi and Thomas used class field theory to explicitly compute the upper ramification breaks of in terms of the valuations of the components of . In this note we use a direct method to show that these formulas remain valid when is an arbitrary perfect field.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 sections, 7 theorems, 22 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1.1

Let $1\le i\le n-1$ and let $\vec{c}=(c_0,\dots,c_{n-i-1})\in W_{n-i}(K)$. Set Then $\chi_{\vec{b}}^K=\eta_{n-i,n}\circ\chi_{\vec{c}}^K$.

Theorems & Definitions (14)

  • Lemma 1.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 1.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • ...and 4 more