Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Emission photon statistics in collectively interacting dipole atom arrays in the low-intensity limit

Deepak A. Suresh, F. Robicheaux

Abstract

We investigate the photon statistics of light emitted from a system of collectively interacting dipoles in the low-intensity regime, incorporating double-excitation states to capture beyond-single-excitation effects. By analyzing the eigenstates of the double-excitation manifold, we establish their connection to the accessible single-excitation eigenmodes and investigate the role of decay rates in shaping the zero-time-delay photon correlation function $g^{(2)}(τ= 0)$ under different detection schemes. The photon emission statistics can be arbitrarily controlled by interfering two beams of light that selectively address orthogonal eigenmodes. This can act as a tunable nonlinearity that enables both enhancement or suppression of two-photon emission.

Emission photon statistics in collectively interacting dipole atom arrays in the low-intensity limit

Abstract

We investigate the photon statistics of light emitted from a system of collectively interacting dipoles in the low-intensity regime, incorporating double-excitation states to capture beyond-single-excitation effects. By analyzing the eigenstates of the double-excitation manifold, we establish their connection to the accessible single-excitation eigenmodes and investigate the role of decay rates in shaping the zero-time-delay photon correlation function under different detection schemes. The photon emission statistics can be arbitrarily controlled by interfering two beams of light that selectively address orthogonal eigenmodes. This can act as a tunable nonlinearity that enables both enhancement or suppression of two-photon emission.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 27 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: An example schematic of the atomic energy levels for $N = 4$ atoms. 0 and 1 represent the atoms being in the ground and excited state, respectively. $|g\rangle$ represents the collective ground state. $|e_j\rangle$ represents the single-excitation states and $|ee_{\mu}\rangle$ represents the double-excitation states.
  • Figure 2: The decay rate of the second photon ($\zeta_\beta$) versus the decay rate of the first photon ($\gamma_{\beta}^{(2)}$) from a double-excitation eigenmode $\beta$. The separation has been varied from 0.3 to 1.0 $\lambda$. The color shows the separation $d$ of the atoms in the array. The dashed line corresponds to $\zeta_\beta = \gamma_{\beta}^{(2)}/2$.
  • Figure 3: The overlap between single and double-excitation eigenmodes. (a) The $\vert X_{\alpha\beta}\vert$ of the single-excitation eigenmode $\alpha$ and double-excitation eigenmode $\beta$ versus the difference in decay rate $(\gamma_{\beta}^{(2)} - 2 \gamma_\alpha)/\Gamma_0$. (b) The $\vert L_{\alpha_1 \alpha_2 \beta}\vert$ of the single-excitation eigenmodes $\alpha_1$, $\alpha_2$ and the double-excitation eigenmode $\beta$ versus the difference in decay rate $(\gamma_{\beta}^{(2)} - \gamma_{\alpha_1} - \gamma_{\alpha_2})/\Gamma_0$, where $\alpha_1 \neq \alpha_2$. The data is shown for inter-atom separation of $d = 0.4 \lambda$. The contour depicts the density of points. The data is calculated for a square array of 25 atoms.
  • Figure 4: The $g^{(2)}(0)$ when excited using a single eigenmode $\alpha$ for an ensemble of 25 atoms arranged in a square array, versus the decay rate of the eigenmode ($\gamma_\alpha$). (a) depicts the situation when the detection is also in mode $\alpha$, where subradiant states exhibit anti-bunching despite the presence of double-excitation states. (b) corresponds to detection over all of free space, in which subradiant states instead display bunched emission. The separation has been varied from 0.3 to 1.0 $\lambda$. The color shows the separation $d$ of the atoms in the array. The dotted line shows the independent-emitter incoherent emission $g^{(2)}(0)$ for $25$ atoms.
  • Figure 5: The $g^{(2)}(0)$ when two eigenmodes are incident and the light emitted into one mode is detected. (a) depicts the dependence on the relative phase $\phi$ at relative amplitude $A = 2.8$ and (b) depicts the maximum and minimum range of $g^{(2)}(0)$ possible when the relative amplitude $A$ is varied. The black dotted line is a reference for $g^{(2)}(0) = 1$.