Advancing Human-Machine Teaming: Concepts, Challenges, and Applications
Dian Chen, Han Jun Yoon, Zelin Wan, Nithin Alluru, Sang Won Lee, Richard He, Terrence J. Moore, Frederica F. Nelson, Sunghyun Yoon, Hyuk Lim, Dan Dongseong Kim, Jin-Hee Cho
TL;DR
This survey advances Human-Machine Teaming (HMT) by offering a unified taxonomy, a cross-disciplinary evaluation framework, and an empirical synthesis of performance drivers across training, autonomy, trust, and shared cognition. It integrates three theoretical lenses—Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learning, Instance-Based Learning Theory, and Interdependence Theory—while emphasizing trustworthy design, ethics, and multi-domain applicability. The work also foregrounds evaluation methodologies, testbeds, and datasets, highlighting gaps in real-world validation and standardized benchmarking. Together, these contributions lay a foundation for resilient, ethical, and scalable HMT systems with practical impact across defense, healthcare, robotics, and cyber domains.
Abstract
Human-Machine Teaming (HMT) is revolutionizing collaboration across domains such as defense, healthcare, and autonomous systems by integrating AI-driven decision-making, trust calibration, and adaptive teaming. This survey presents a comprehensive taxonomy of HMT, analyzing theoretical models, including reinforcement learning, instance-based learning, and interdependence theory, alongside interdisciplinary methodologies. Unlike prior reviews, we examine team cognition, ethical AI, multi-modal interactions, and real-world evaluation frameworks. Key challenges include explainability, role allocation, and scalable benchmarking. We propose future research in cross-domain adaptation, trust-aware AI, and standardized testbeds. By bridging computational and social sciences, this work lays a foundation for resilient, ethical, and scalable HMT systems.
