Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Two dimensional versions of the affine Grassmannian and their geometric description

Andrea Maffei, Valerio Melani, Gabriele Vezzosi

TL;DR

This work extends the affine Grassmannian to two variables by studying quotients of the double loop group $LLG$ by natural subgroups, defining several 2D Grassmannians and proving their ind-scheme representability for solvable $G$. It then builds geometric counterparts on a smooth surface $X$ with a flag $(D,Z)$ and develops a fibre-functor framework to interpret these objects as moduli of bundles with trivializations on prescribed loci, establishing comparisons with the corresponding quotient Grassmannians in low-dimensional models such as $X= ext{A}^2$. Key results include Theorem A and Theorem B, which provide ind-representability and canonical identifications in special cases, and Theorem C with corollaries that extend these identifications to arbitrary $X$ via reduction to affine patches. The paper also outlines future directions, including potential 2D Geometric Satake, and suggests extending the geometric jet Grassmannian to varying flags in a broader program. Overall, it develops a concrete, flag-aware two-dimensional generalization of the Beilinson–Drinfeld Grassmannian with explicit ind-scheme models in the solvable setting and a geometric interpretation on surfaces.

Abstract

For a smooth affine algebraic group $G$ over an algebraically closed field, we consider several two-variables generalizations of the affine Grassmannian $G(\!(t)\!)/G[\![t]\!]$, given by quotients of the double loop group $G(\!(x)\!)(\!(y)\!)$. We prove that they are representable by ind-schemes if $G$ is solvable. Given a smooth surface $X$ and a flag of subschemes of $X$, we provide a geometric interpretation of the two-variables Grassmannians, in terms of bundles and trivialisation data defined on appropriate loci in $X$, which depend on the flag.

Two dimensional versions of the affine Grassmannian and their geometric description

TL;DR

This work extends the affine Grassmannian to two variables by studying quotients of the double loop group by natural subgroups, defining several 2D Grassmannians and proving their ind-scheme representability for solvable . It then builds geometric counterparts on a smooth surface with a flag and develops a fibre-functor framework to interpret these objects as moduli of bundles with trivializations on prescribed loci, establishing comparisons with the corresponding quotient Grassmannians in low-dimensional models such as . Key results include Theorem A and Theorem B, which provide ind-representability and canonical identifications in special cases, and Theorem C with corollaries that extend these identifications to arbitrary via reduction to affine patches. The paper also outlines future directions, including potential 2D Geometric Satake, and suggests extending the geometric jet Grassmannian to varying flags in a broader program. Overall, it develops a concrete, flag-aware two-dimensional generalization of the Beilinson–Drinfeld Grassmannian with explicit ind-scheme models in the solvable setting and a geometric interpretation on surfaces.

Abstract

For a smooth affine algebraic group over an algebraically closed field, we consider several two-variables generalizations of the affine Grassmannian , given by quotients of the double loop group . We prove that they are representable by ind-schemes if is solvable. Given a smooth surface and a flag of subschemes of , we provide a geometric interpretation of the two-variables Grassmannians, in terms of bundles and trivialisation data defined on appropriate loci in , which depend on the flag.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 27 sections, 27 theorems, 154 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1.2

If $G$ is solvable group then there exists an ind-affine ind-scheme such that for all $k$ algebras $R$, every element in $LG(R)/JG(R)$ has a unique representative in $\Sigma_{G}$. This implies that $LG/JG$ is an ind-affine ind-scheme and, in particular, a sheaf for the fppf topology.

Theorems & Definitions (67)

  • Remark 1.1
  • Lemma 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • proof
  • Remark 1.4
  • Definition 1.5
  • Remark 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Remark 1.8
  • Lemma 1.9
  • ...and 57 more