Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Modulated phases in Ising systems with long-range antiferromagnetic and short-range ferromagnetic interactions

Andrea Braides, Fabrizio Caragiulo

TL;DR

The paper analyzes a one-dimensional spin system with competing short-range ferromagnetic and long-range antiferromagnetic interactions under periodic boundary conditions. It uses $\Gamma$-convergence to derive a sharp limit description of near-ground-state configurations, showing that they decompose into a finite set of modulated phases translations of the absolute ground state with interfacial defects, and that the limiting energy $F_{\infty}$ is a sum of defect energies over the jump set of a limit map $r$. The defect energy density $\phi(j)$ is defined as a limit of renormalized minimal energies and is shown to satisfy $\phi(0)=0$, $\phi(j)>0$ for nonzero $j$ mod $2h^{\star}$, and subadditivity, enabling a rigorous $\Gamma$-limit $F_{\infty}^j(r)=\sum_{x\in J(r)} \phi(\Delta r(x))$ on $r:\mathbb{T}\to \mathbb{Z}/2h^{\star}\mathbb{Z}$. This framework bridges the discrete lattice problem with a continuum-like partition energy, clarifying how texture-forming modulated phases emerge and how interfacial costs govern the coarse-grained behavior, with potential extensions to higher dimensions.

Abstract

We consider large spin systems with short-range ferromagnetic interactions and long-range antiferromagnetic interactions subjected to periodic boundary conditions which have been proved by Giuliani, Lebowitz and Lieb to have minimizers that tend to alternate groups of $1$ and $-1$ of the same length $h^\star$. We consider states with energy of the same order as that of minimizers and show that they consist of a finite number of modulated phases of the same form as minimizers with some interfacial defects. The analysis is carried out using the notation of Gamma-convergence by exhibiting an interfacial energy that describes the minimal defect energy between different modulated phases.

Modulated phases in Ising systems with long-range antiferromagnetic and short-range ferromagnetic interactions

TL;DR

The paper analyzes a one-dimensional spin system with competing short-range ferromagnetic and long-range antiferromagnetic interactions under periodic boundary conditions. It uses -convergence to derive a sharp limit description of near-ground-state configurations, showing that they decompose into a finite set of modulated phases translations of the absolute ground state with interfacial defects, and that the limiting energy is a sum of defect energies over the jump set of a limit map . The defect energy density is defined as a limit of renormalized minimal energies and is shown to satisfy , for nonzero mod , and subadditivity, enabling a rigorous -limit on . This framework bridges the discrete lattice problem with a continuum-like partition energy, clarifying how texture-forming modulated phases emerge and how interfacial costs govern the coarse-grained behavior, with potential extensions to higher dimensions.

Abstract

We consider large spin systems with short-range ferromagnetic interactions and long-range antiferromagnetic interactions subjected to periodic boundary conditions which have been proved by Giuliani, Lebowitz and Lieb to have minimizers that tend to alternate groups of and of the same length . We consider states with energy of the same order as that of minimizers and show that they consist of a finite number of modulated phases of the same form as minimizers with some interfacial defects. The analysis is carried out using the notation of Gamma-convergence by exhibiting an interfacial energy that describes the minimal defect energy between different modulated phases.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 6 theorems, 63 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

If $1<p\le 2$ and $J$ is arbitrary or if $p>2$ and $J<J_p$, then $e$ attains its minimum on $\mathbb N$ at most two different points $h^\star , h^\star +1$. If $p>2$ and $J>J_p$ then $e$ is always decreasing.

Theorems & Definitions (14)

  • Lemma 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: Ground state energy asymptotics, energy gap and ground states
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Definition 3.2: convergence of spin states to piecewise-continuous functions
  • Lemma 3.3: Decoupling of defects
  • proof
  • Remark 3.4
  • Lemma 3.5: Localization
  • proof
  • ...and 4 more