Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On a Dissimilarity Metric for Analyzing Body Synergistic Coordination in Non-Periodic Motion

Shunpei Fujii, Kanta Tachibana

TL;DR

Addresses measuring synergistic coordination between body segments in aperiodic motions (e.g., baseball pitching) by overcoming DTW's temporal warping and joint-wise similarity limitations. Proposes a convolution-based dissimilarity metric grounded in Linear Time-Invariant dynamics, using transfer functions $G_1(z)=\frac{B(z)}{A(z)}$ and $G_2(z)=\frac{Y(z)}{X(z)}$ and convolution descriptors $u=(a*y)$, $v=(x*b)$ with $\mathrm{Dis}((a,b),(x,y))=\frac{||u-v||^2}{||u||\,||v||}$. Empirically evaluated on six pitching videos and camera-angle perturbations, the method distinguishes same-pitcher from different-pitcher motions and remains robust to viewing angle and scale, outperforming DTW and some deep-learning baselines. The approach offers a principled, rhythm-aware tool for assessing inter-segment coordination with potential applications in sports analytics, rehabilitation, and robotics.

Abstract

This study proposes a novel metric to quantitatively evaluate body synergistic coordination, explicitly addressing dynamic interactions between pairs of body segments in baseball pitching motions. Conventional methods typically compare motion trajectories using individual joint coordinates or velocities independently, employing techniques like Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) that inherently apply temporal alignment even when such correction may distort meaningful rhythm-based differences. In contrast, our approach models the coordination dynamics as Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) systems, leveraging convolution operations between pairs of time series data to capture the gain and phase-lag inherent in genuine coordination dynamics. Empirical validation demonstrates the robustness of the proposed metric to variations in camera angles and scaling, providing superior discriminative capability compared to DTW and deep learning-based methods.

On a Dissimilarity Metric for Analyzing Body Synergistic Coordination in Non-Periodic Motion

TL;DR

Addresses measuring synergistic coordination between body segments in aperiodic motions (e.g., baseball pitching) by overcoming DTW's temporal warping and joint-wise similarity limitations. Proposes a convolution-based dissimilarity metric grounded in Linear Time-Invariant dynamics, using transfer functions and and convolution descriptors , with . Empirically evaluated on six pitching videos and camera-angle perturbations, the method distinguishes same-pitcher from different-pitcher motions and remains robust to viewing angle and scale, outperforming DTW and some deep-learning baselines. The approach offers a principled, rhythm-aware tool for assessing inter-segment coordination with potential applications in sports analytics, rehabilitation, and robotics.

Abstract

This study proposes a novel metric to quantitatively evaluate body synergistic coordination, explicitly addressing dynamic interactions between pairs of body segments in baseball pitching motions. Conventional methods typically compare motion trajectories using individual joint coordinates or velocities independently, employing techniques like Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) that inherently apply temporal alignment even when such correction may distort meaningful rhythm-based differences. In contrast, our approach models the coordination dynamics as Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) systems, leveraging convolution operations between pairs of time series data to capture the gain and phase-lag inherent in genuine coordination dynamics. Empirical validation demonstrates the robustness of the proposed metric to variations in camera angles and scaling, providing superior discriminative capability compared to DTW and deep learning-based methods.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 11 equations, 11 figures, 1 table.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: Discrete time-series data of ankle and wrist speeds of pitcher A.
  • Figure 2: Discrete time-series data of ankle and wrist speeds of pitcher B.
  • Figure 3: Dendrogram based on the proposed dissimilarity.
  • Figure 4: Convolution vectors computed from ankle-wrist velocity signals for two pitching motions by Pitcher A.
  • Figure 5: Convolution vectors computed from ankle-wrist velocity signals for two pitching motions by Pitcher B.
  • ...and 6 more figures