Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The law of the circumference of sparse binomial random graphs

Michael Anastos, Joshua Erde, Mihyun Kang, Vincent Pfenninger

TL;DR

This work proves a central limit theorem for the circumference $L(G(n, rac{c}{n}))$ of sparse random graphs by developing a robust, multi-scale local approximation built around a strong $4$-core colouring. The authors decompose the circumference into a global quantity $L$ and a sequence of local approximations $ ilde{L}$, $ ilde{L}_k$, and $ ilde{L}_k^{\text{hat}}$, and transfer a CLT from the local neighbourhood counts to the global parameter via the Efron–Stein inequality and Stein’s method. A key contribution is a nontrivial variance lower bound achieved through a two-round edge-revealing scheme and the robust sapphire property, ensuring that fluctuations persist at scale $n$; this yields a limiting per-vertex variance $oldsymbol{ ho}^2$ with bounds $C_1 e^{-10c} \le \boldsymbol{ ho}^2 \le C_2 c$. The framework also offers a blueprint potentially applicable to other global graph parameters, such as the $k$-core and the matching number, illustrating a path to distributional results in sparse regimes beyond existing scaling laws.

Abstract

There has been much interest in the distribution of the circumference, the length of the longest cycle, of a random graph $G(n,p)$ in the sparse regime, when $p = Θ\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)$. Recently, the first author and Frieze established a scaling limit for the circumference in this regime, along the way establishing an alternative 'structural' approximation for this parameter. In this paper, we give a central limit theorem for the circumference in this regime using a novel argument based on the Efron-Stein inequality, which relies on a combinatorial analysis of the effect of resampling edges on this approximation.

The law of the circumference of sparse binomial random graphs

TL;DR

This work proves a central limit theorem for the circumference of sparse random graphs by developing a robust, multi-scale local approximation built around a strong -core colouring. The authors decompose the circumference into a global quantity and a sequence of local approximations , , and , and transfer a CLT from the local neighbourhood counts to the global parameter via the Efron–Stein inequality and Stein’s method. A key contribution is a nontrivial variance lower bound achieved through a two-round edge-revealing scheme and the robust sapphire property, ensuring that fluctuations persist at scale ; this yields a limiting per-vertex variance with bounds . The framework also offers a blueprint potentially applicable to other global graph parameters, such as the -core and the matching number, illustrating a path to distributional results in sparse regimes beyond existing scaling laws.

Abstract

There has been much interest in the distribution of the circumference, the length of the longest cycle, of a random graph in the sparse regime, when . Recently, the first author and Frieze established a scaling limit for the circumference in this regime, along the way establishing an alternative 'structural' approximation for this parameter. In this paper, we give a central limit theorem for the circumference in this regime using a novel argument based on the Efron-Stein inequality, which relies on a combinatorial analysis of the effect of resampling edges on this approximation.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 34 sections, 47 theorems, 283 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $c>1$ be a sufficiently large constant. Then there exists a function $f\colon (1,\infty)\to (0,\infty)$ such that

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: The $3$-colouring of a graph $G$ given by \ref{['alg:strong_4_core_alg']}. Note that every vertex in $S\cup P$ has at least $4$ neighbours in $S$ and there is no edge between $R$ and $S$.
  • Figure 2: Vertices in $V\setminus (A \cup B)$ have the same neighbourhoods in $G_1$ and in $G_2$ but in $G_2$ more of these neighbours will be sapphire.

Theorems & Definitions (94)

  • Theorem 1.1: AF21
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Proposition 1.3
  • Theorem 2.1: A23, Theorem 11
  • Corollary 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Corollary 2.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.5
  • ...and 84 more