Empowering LLMs in Decision Games through Algorithmic Data Synthesis
Haolin Wang, Xueyan Li, Yazhe Niu, Shuai Hu, Hongsheng Li
TL;DR
This work addresses the challenge of improving deep reasoning in LLMs by leveraging decision-making games as a textual data source. It introduces MasterMind-Dou and MasterMind-Go, trained via carefully designed data-synthesis pipelines on Doudizhu and Go, to enhance multi-step reasoning and decision making. Empirical results show competitive performance in the games and measurable gains on general reasoning benchmarks, with insights into data collection strategies and model generalization. The findings suggest that decision-making game data can complement code/math data to strengthen structured, long-horizon reasoning and pave the way for more capable generalist agents.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive capabilities across numerous domains, yet they often struggle with complex reasoning and decision-making tasks. Decision-making games, which inherently require multifaceted reasoning logic, serve as ideal sandboxes for evaluating and enhancing the reasoning abilities of LLMs. In this work, we first explore whether LLMs can master complex decision-making games through targeted post-training. To this end, we design data synthesis strategies and curate extensive offline datasets from two classic games, Doudizhu and Go. We further develop a suite of techniques to effectively incorporate this data into LLM training, resulting in two novel agents: Mastermind-Dou and Mastermind-Go. Our experimental results demonstrate that these Mastermind LLMs achieve competitive performance in their respective games. Additionally, we explore whether integrating decision-making data can enhance the general reasoning abilities of LLMs. Our findings suggest that such post-training improves certain aspects of reasoning, providing valuable insights for optimizing LLM data collection and synthesis strategies.
