Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Doubly partially conservative sentences

Haruka Kogure, Taishi Kurahashi

TL;DR

This work advances the understanding of Solovay-type results by systematically examining doubly conservative sentences across multiple arithmetical levels and their hereditary versions. It introduces and leverages relativized conservativity notions, $\Delta_{n+1}(U)$-sentences, and witness-comparison predicates to establish precise equivalences between the existence of such sentences and relativized consistency conditions like $\Sigma_{n+1}$-consistency over $PA$. The authors provide a network of results, including a central equivalence: a $\Delta_{n+1}(PA)$ sentence that is doubly $(\Sigma_n,\Sigma_n)$-conservative over $T$ exists exactly when $T$ is not $\Sigma_{n+1}$-consistent over $PA$, and they extend this analysis to several triples $(\Theta,\Gamma,\Lambda)$ with comprehensive tables. They further develop hereditary variants, linking the existence of horodical doubly conservative sentences to $\Sigma_n{\downarrow}\Pi_n$-conservativity, and they present both constructive and nonexistence results (notably for $\Delta_{n+1}(PA)$). Altogether, the paper maps the boundary between provability-conservativity and relative consistency, clarifying when strong double-conservativity manifestations can occur and how they propagate through subtheories of arithmetic.

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to analyze several variants of Solovay's theorem on the existence of doubly partially conservative sentences. First, we investigate $Θ$ sentences that are doubly $(Γ, Λ)$-conservative over $T$ for several triples $(Θ, Γ, Λ)$. Among other things, we prove that the existence of a $Δ_{n+1}(\mathsf{PA})$ sentence that is doubly $(Σ_n, Σ_n)$-conservative over $T$ is equivalent to the $Σ_{n+1}$-inconsistency of $T$ over $\mathsf{PA}$. Secondly, we study $Θ$ sentences that are hereditarily doubly $(Γ, Λ)$-conservative over $T$ for several triples $(Θ, Γ, Λ)$.

Doubly partially conservative sentences

TL;DR

This work advances the understanding of Solovay-type results by systematically examining doubly conservative sentences across multiple arithmetical levels and their hereditary versions. It introduces and leverages relativized conservativity notions, -sentences, and witness-comparison predicates to establish precise equivalences between the existence of such sentences and relativized consistency conditions like -consistency over . The authors provide a network of results, including a central equivalence: a sentence that is doubly -conservative over exists exactly when is not -consistent over , and they extend this analysis to several triples with comprehensive tables. They further develop hereditary variants, linking the existence of horodical doubly conservative sentences to -conservativity, and they present both constructive and nonexistence results (notably for ). Altogether, the paper maps the boundary between provability-conservativity and relative consistency, clarifying when strong double-conservativity manifestations can occur and how they propagate through subtheories of arithmetic.

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to analyze several variants of Solovay's theorem on the existence of doubly partially conservative sentences. First, we investigate sentences that are doubly -conservative over for several triples . Among other things, we prove that the existence of a sentence that is doubly -conservative over is equivalent to the -inconsistency of over . Secondly, we study sentences that are hereditarily doubly -conservative over for several triples .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 34 theorems, 50 equations, 4 figures, 8 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

For any formulas $\varphi \equiv \exists x \alpha(x)$ and $\psi \equiv \exists x \beta(x)$, the following clauses hold:

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: The implications between the variations of partial conservativity
  • Figure 2: Equivalences and implications between the conditions
  • Figure 3: The implications between the conditions for $n=1$
  • Figure 4: Implications between the conditions

Theorems & Definitions (84)

  • Proposition 2.1: cf. Lindström Lin
  • Proposition 2.2: cf. Lindström Lin and Kogure and Kurahashi KK
  • Definition 2.3: $\Gamma$-conservativity
  • Definition 2.5: Hereditary $\Gamma$-conservativity
  • Definition 3.1: Double $(\Gamma, \Lambda)$-conservativity
  • Theorem 3.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.4
  • proof
  • Definition 3.5
  • ...and 74 more