Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On a conjecture of Erdős and Graham about the Sylvester's sequence

Zheng Li, Quanyu Tang

TL;DR

The paper addresses Erdős and Graham’s conjecture comparing the growth rate of any unit-reciprocal sequence {a_i} with that of Sylvester’s sequence {u_n}, showing liminf_{n→∞} a_n^{1/2^n} is strictly smaller than lim_{n→∞} u_n^{1/2^n}=c_0≈1.264085 when ∑ 1/a_i=1. It provides a constructive proof by explicitly building an eventually Sylvester sequence {c_n} that satisfies the same unit-sum constraint and lies below the Sylvester sequence in the 2^−n-exponent metric. It also develops a conditional, non-constructive generalization relying on a conjectured property of greedy best Egyptian underapproximations (Conjecture 2), leading to existence results for a distinct {c_n} and analogous inequalities. Together, these results advance our understanding of unit-fraction representations, Egyptian greedy algorithms, and the Erdős–Graham problem landscape, with connections to recent independent work and open questions about characterizing when greedy best underapproximations are unique.

Abstract

Let $\{u_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ be the Sylvester's sequence (sequence A000058 in the OEIS), and let $ a_1 < a_2 < \cdots $ be any other positive integer sequence satisfying $ \sum_{i=1}^\infty \frac{1}{a_i} = 1 $. In this paper, we solve a conjecture of Erdős and Graham, which asks whether $$ \liminf_{n\to\infty} a_n^{\frac{1}{2^n}} < \lim_{n\to\infty} u_n^{\frac{1}{2^n}} = c_0 = 1.264085\ldots. $$ We prove this conjecture using a constructive approach. Furthermore, assuming that the unproven claim of Erdős and Graham that "all rationals have eventually greedy best Egyptian underapproximations" holds, we establish a generalization of this conjecture using a non-constructive approach. [This paper solves Problem 315 on Bloom's website "Erdős problems".]

On a conjecture of Erdős and Graham about the Sylvester's sequence

TL;DR

The paper addresses Erdős and Graham’s conjecture comparing the growth rate of any unit-reciprocal sequence {a_i} with that of Sylvester’s sequence {u_n}, showing liminf_{n→∞} a_n^{1/2^n} is strictly smaller than lim_{n→∞} u_n^{1/2^n}=c_0≈1.264085 when ∑ 1/a_i=1. It provides a constructive proof by explicitly building an eventually Sylvester sequence {c_n} that satisfies the same unit-sum constraint and lies below the Sylvester sequence in the 2^−n-exponent metric. It also develops a conditional, non-constructive generalization relying on a conjectured property of greedy best Egyptian underapproximations (Conjecture 2), leading to existence results for a distinct {c_n} and analogous inequalities. Together, these results advance our understanding of unit-fraction representations, Egyptian greedy algorithms, and the Erdős–Graham problem landscape, with connections to recent independent work and open questions about characterizing when greedy best underapproximations are unique.

Abstract

Let be the Sylvester's sequence (sequence A000058 in the OEIS), and let be any other positive integer sequence satisfying . In this paper, we solve a conjecture of Erdős and Graham, which asks whether We prove this conjecture using a constructive approach. Furthermore, assuming that the unproven claim of Erdős and Graham that "all rationals have eventually greedy best Egyptian underapproximations" holds, we establish a generalization of this conjecture using a non-constructive approach. [This paper solves Problem 315 on Bloom's website "Erdős problems".]

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 16 theorems, 165 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.5

Let $\{u_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ be the Sylvester’s sequence, and let $N \geq 2$ be a positive integer. Let $\{a_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ be any eventually Sylvester sequence of positive real numbers satisfying the recurrence relation Suppose that $\{a_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ also satisfies the following two conditions: Then

Theorems & Definitions (41)

  • Example 1.1: Sylvester's Sequence
  • Remark 1.2
  • Conjecture 1.3
  • Definition 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Corollary 1.7
  • Conjecture 1.8: EG80Gra13Nat23
  • Theorem 1.9
  • Corollary 1.10
  • ...and 31 more