Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the spectrum of limit models

Jeremy Beard, Marcos Mazari-Armida

TL;DR

This work develops a precise spectrum for limit models in nice AECs under a well-behaved independence notion. By introducing towers and their reduced/full variants, it proves that long limit models are isomorphic over a base when the limit's cofinality is large enough, while short limit models are non-isomorphic when cofinalities diverge, under tameness and independence assumptions. The main results yield a local-to-global picture: the isomorphism type of limit models is governed by the local invariants $ extchi( extsmile, extbf{K}, extle_K^u)$ and $ heta( extsmile, extbf{K})$, with corollaries for tame AECs and explicit applications to modules, torsion groups, and first-order theories. This framework provides robust tools for understanding the spectrum of limit models in natural AECs and offers a vehicle for deriving concrete classification-type conclusions in algebraic contexts.

Abstract

We study the spectrum of limit models assuming the existence of a nicely behaved independence notion. Under reasonable assumptions, we show that all `long' limit models are isomorphic, and all `short' limit models are non-isomorphic. $\textbf{Theorem.}$ Let $\mathbf{K}$ be a $\aleph_0$-tame abstract elementary class stable in $λ\geq \operatorname{LS}(\mathbf{K})$ with amalgamation, joint embedding and no maximal models. Suppose there is an independence relation on the models of size $λ$ that satisfies uniqueness, extension, non-forking amalgamation, universal continuity, and $(\geq κ)$-local character in a minimal regular $κ< λ^+$. Suppose $δ_1, δ_2 < λ^+$ with $\operatorname{cf}(δ_1) < \operatorname{cf}(δ_2)$. Then for any $N_1, N_2, M \in \mathbf{K}_λ$ where $N_l$ is a $(λ, δ_l)$-limit model over $M$ for $l = 1, 2$, \[N_1 \text{ is isomorphic to } N_2 \text{ over } M \iff \operatorname{cf}(δ_1) \geq κ\] Both implications in the conclusion have improvements. High cofinality limits are isomorphic without the $\aleph_0$-tameness assumption and assuming the independence relation is defined only on high cofinality limit models. Low cofinality limits are non-isomorphic without assuming non-forking amalgamation. We show how our results can be used to study limit models in both abstract settings and in natural examples of abstract elementary classes.

On the spectrum of limit models

TL;DR

This work develops a precise spectrum for limit models in nice AECs under a well-behaved independence notion. By introducing towers and their reduced/full variants, it proves that long limit models are isomorphic over a base when the limit's cofinality is large enough, while short limit models are non-isomorphic when cofinalities diverge, under tameness and independence assumptions. The main results yield a local-to-global picture: the isomorphism type of limit models is governed by the local invariants and , with corollaries for tame AECs and explicit applications to modules, torsion groups, and first-order theories. This framework provides robust tools for understanding the spectrum of limit models in natural AECs and offers a vehicle for deriving concrete classification-type conclusions in algebraic contexts.

Abstract

We study the spectrum of limit models assuming the existence of a nicely behaved independence notion. Under reasonable assumptions, we show that all `long' limit models are isomorphic, and all `short' limit models are non-isomorphic. Let be a -tame abstract elementary class stable in with amalgamation, joint embedding and no maximal models. Suppose there is an independence relation on the models of size that satisfies uniqueness, extension, non-forking amalgamation, universal continuity, and -local character in a minimal regular . Suppose with . Then for any where is a -limit model over for , Both implications in the conclusion have improvements. High cofinality limits are isomorphic without the -tameness assumption and assuming the independence relation is defined only on high cofinality limit models. Low cofinality limits are non-isomorphic without assuming non-forking amalgamation. We show how our results can be used to study limit models in both abstract settings and in natural examples of abstract elementary classes.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 20 sections, 49 theorems, 12 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Lemma 2.18

Let $\mathbf{K}$ be an AC with an independence relation $\mathop{\hbox{$\smile$}}\limits$ satisfying uniqueness. Then extension is equivalent to saying that whenever $M \le_{\mathbf{K}} N$ and $p \in \mathbf{gS}(M)$$\mathop{\hbox{$\smile$}}\limits$-does not fork over $M$, then there is $q \in \mathb

Figures (1)

  • Figure :

Theorems & Definitions (170)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Remark 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Definition 2.8
  • Remark 2.9
  • proof
  • Definition 2.11
  • Definition 2.12
  • Definition 2.13
  • ...and 160 more