Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Reformulation of $q$-middle convolution and applications

Yumi Arai, Kouichi Takemura

TL;DR

The paper presents a streamlined reformulation of Sakai–Yamaguchi's q–convolution and q–middle convolution, introducing a q–deformation of addition and establishing convergence criteria for Jackson-integral representations. A central advance is the additivity of composition: mc^q_lambda ∘ mc^q_mu = mc^q_{lambda+mu} under suitable conditions, enabling systematic generation of higher-order q–difference equations from simpler seeds. The authors construct and analyze several third-order q–difference equations, including generalized q–hypergeometric and q–Jordan–Pochhammer variants, and provide formal q–integral representations that, under convergence hypotheses, yield actual solutions. They also develop a framework for composing q–middle convolutions and relate these constructions to the spectral-type/rigidity viewpoint, with q→1 limits connecting to classical differential equations. Overall, the work supplies new tools for generating and solving q–difference equations via q-convolution and adds depth to the intersection of q-analogues and rigid local systems.

Abstract

We reformulate the $q$-convolution and the $q$-middle convolution introduced by Sakai and Yamaguchi, and we introduce $q$-deformations of the addition which is related to the gauge-transformation. A merit of the reformulation is the additivity on composition of two $q$-middle convolutions. We obtain sufficient conditions that the Jackson integrals associated with the $q$-convolution converge and satisfy the $q$-difference equation associated with the $q$-convolution. We present several third-order linear $q$-difference equations and solutions of them by using the $q$-middle convolution and the $q$-deformations of the addition.

Reformulation of $q$-middle convolution and applications

TL;DR

The paper presents a streamlined reformulation of Sakai–Yamaguchi's q–convolution and q–middle convolution, introducing a q–deformation of addition and establishing convergence criteria for Jackson-integral representations. A central advance is the additivity of composition: mc^q_lambda ∘ mc^q_mu = mc^q_{lambda+mu} under suitable conditions, enabling systematic generation of higher-order q–difference equations from simpler seeds. The authors construct and analyze several third-order q–difference equations, including generalized q–hypergeometric and q–Jordan–Pochhammer variants, and provide formal q–integral representations that, under convergence hypotheses, yield actual solutions. They also develop a framework for composing q–middle convolutions and relate these constructions to the spectral-type/rigidity viewpoint, with q→1 limits connecting to classical differential equations. Overall, the work supplies new tools for generating and solving q–difference equations via q-convolution and adds depth to the intersection of q-analogues and rigid local systems.

Abstract

We reformulate the -convolution and the -middle convolution introduced by Sakai and Yamaguchi, and we introduce -deformations of the addition which is related to the gauge-transformation. A merit of the reformulation is the additivity on composition of two -middle convolutions. We obtain sufficient conditions that the Jackson integrals associated with the -convolution converge and satisfy the -difference equation associated with the -convolution. We present several third-order linear -difference equations and solutions of them by using the -middle convolution and the -deformations of the addition.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 22 theorems, 216 equations, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 3.2

$($c.f. SY, AT$)$ Set $b_0=0$. Let $Y(x)$ be a solution to and set Assume that the variable $\xi$ is independent of the variable $x$ or it is proportional to $x$ (i.e. $\xi =Ax$ where $A$ is independent of $x$). If every element of $\widetilde{Y}_{i} (x)$ converges for $i=0,1 , \dots ,N$ and then the function $\widetilde{Y}(x)$ satisfies

Theorems & Definitions (29)

  • Theorem 3.2
  • Proposition 3.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.5
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.6
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.7
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.8
  • ...and 19 more