Sharp well-posedness and ill-posedness of the stationary quasi-geostrophic equation
Mikihiro Fujii, Tsukasa Iwabuchi
TL;DR
This work classifies the well-posedness versus ill-posedness of the stationary quasi-geostrophic equation on $\mathbb{R}^2$ within scaling-critical Besov spaces. By reformulating the nonlinear term as a double-divergence operator $\mathcal{B}[\cdot,\cdot]$, the authors unveil a favorable structure that enables sharp a priori estimates and a contraction mapping proof of well-posedness for $(p,q)\in([1,4)\times[1,\infty])\cup\{(4,2)\}$. They also construct forcing sequences that drive ill-posedness outside this range, demonstrating norm inflation and discontinuity of the data-to-solution map in various Besov topologies. The results clearly separate the well-posed regime from the ill-posed regime and establish the sharp boundary, contributing a precise counterpart to known NS ill-posedness results in two dimensions. The methods combine paraproduct calculus, bilinear Fourier multipliers, and a tailored fixed-point argument to obtain a complete classification.
Abstract
We consider the stationary problem for the quasi-geostrophic equation on the whole plane and investigate its well-posedness and ill-posedness. In[Fujii, Ann. PDE 10, 10 (2024)], it was shown that the two-dimensional stationary Navier--Stokes equations are ill-posed in the critical Besov spaces $\dot B_{p,1}^{\frac{2}{p}-1}(\mathbb{R}^2)$ with $1 \leq p \leq 2$. Although the quasi-geostrophic equation has the same invariant scale structure as the Navier--Stokes equations, we reveal that the quasi-geostrophic equation is well-posed in the scaling critical Besov spaces $\dot B_{p,q}^{\frac{2}{p}-1}(\mathbb{R}^2)$ with $(p,q) \in [1,4) \times [1,\infty]$ or $(p,q)=(4,2)$ due to the better properties of the nonlinear structure of the quasi-geostrophic equation compared to that of the Navier--Stokes equations. Moreover, we also prove the optimality for the above range of $(p,q)$ ensuring the well-posedness in the sense that the stationary quasi-geostrophic equation is ill-posed for all the other cases.
