Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the Bogomolov-Positselski Conjecture

Julian Feuerpfeil

TL;DR

The paper develops new group-theoretic criteria for identifying the Bogomolov-Positselski property within $p$-oriented pro-$p$ groups, bridging Positselski’s Koszulity framework with the Hochschild–Serre approach of Quadrelli–Weigel. It introduces a central exact-sequence criterion tying $ ext{ker}\,d_2^{2,1}$ to the vanishing of a $ ext{Tor}$-group and the isomorphism of a key map, and leverages conilpotent coalgebra techniques to derive a weaker, yet computably verifiable Bogomolov–Positselski criterion under Koszul-like hypotheses. Additionally, the work provides a route to relax Positselski’s conditions and makes the criteria computationally accessible in finite-dimension settings by reducing checks to a handful of Ext/Tor computations. These results connect Galois-cohomology, Milnor $K$-theory, and quadratic Koszulity concepts, offering practical tools for verifying the Bogomolov–Positselski property and advancing understanding of maximal pro-$p$ Galois groups.

Abstract

Let $p$ be a prime, we say that a Kummerian oriented pro-$p$ group $(G,θ)$ has the Bogomolov-Positselski property if $I_θ(G)$ is a free pro-$p$ group. We give a new criterion for an oriented pro-$p$ group to have the Bogomolov-Positselski property based on previous work by Positselski (arXiv:1405.0965) and Quadrelli and Weigel (arXiv:2103.12438) linking their seemingly unrelated approaches and thereby answering a question posed by Quadrelli and Weigel. Under further assumptions, we derive two additional criteria. The first of which strongly resembles an analogue of the Merkujev-Suslin theorem. The second allows to relax the conditions given by Positselski in Theorem 2 of arXiv:1405.0965. In addition, we show how to make those weaker assumptions computationally effective in some special cases.

On the Bogomolov-Positselski Conjecture

TL;DR

The paper develops new group-theoretic criteria for identifying the Bogomolov-Positselski property within -oriented pro- groups, bridging Positselski’s Koszulity framework with the Hochschild–Serre approach of Quadrelli–Weigel. It introduces a central exact-sequence criterion tying to the vanishing of a -group and the isomorphism of a key map, and leverages conilpotent coalgebra techniques to derive a weaker, yet computably verifiable Bogomolov–Positselski criterion under Koszul-like hypotheses. Additionally, the work provides a route to relax Positselski’s conditions and makes the criteria computationally accessible in finite-dimension settings by reducing checks to a handful of Ext/Tor computations. These results connect Galois-cohomology, Milnor -theory, and quadratic Koszulity concepts, offering practical tools for verifying the Bogomolov–Positselski property and advancing understanding of maximal pro- Galois groups.

Abstract

Let be a prime, we say that a Kummerian oriented pro- group has the Bogomolov-Positselski property if is a free pro- group. We give a new criterion for an oriented pro- group to have the Bogomolov-Positselski property based on previous work by Positselski (arXiv:1405.0965) and Quadrelli and Weigel (arXiv:2103.12438) linking their seemingly unrelated approaches and thereby answering a question posed by Quadrelli and Weigel. Under further assumptions, we derive two additional criteria. The first of which strongly resembles an analogue of the Merkujev-Suslin theorem. The second allows to relax the conditions given by Positselski in Theorem 2 of arXiv:1405.0965. In addition, we show how to make those weaker assumptions computationally effective in some special cases.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 14 theorems, 23 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.1

Let $\mathbb{K}$ be a field containing a primitve $p^{\text{th}}$-root of unity (and $\sqrt{-1}$ if $p=2$), then $(G_\mathbb{K}(p),\theta_{cycl})$ is a torsion-free, Kummerian oriented pro-$p$ group.

Theorems & Definitions (36)

  • Proposition 1.1: lit:EfratQuadrelli2019
  • Conjecture 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4: lit:Positselski2005
  • Theorem 1.5: lit:WeigelQuadrelli
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Corollary 1.7
  • Remark 1.9
  • Theorem 1.10
  • Definition 2.1
  • ...and 26 more