TSConnect: An Enhanced MOOC Platform for Bridging Communication Gaps Between Instructors and Students in Light of the Curse of Knowledge
Qianyu Liu, Xinran Li, Xiaocong Du, Quan Li
TL;DR
The paper targets the curse of knowledge as a barrier to effective MOOC-based learning. It introduces TSConnect, a bias-aware platform that combines a dynamic knowledge graph with multiple feedback channels to connect instructors, students, and AI. Through formative studies and a between-subjects user study (n=30), TSConnect improves the quality and quantity of student feedback and helps instructors diagnose root causes of learning obstacles, albeit with higher workload and cognitive demands. The work demonstrates potential for data-driven iterative improvement of teaching practices and suggests pathways for bias-aware, student-centered MOOC design with broader applicability beyond traditional online courses.
Abstract
Knowledge dissemination in educational settings is profoundly influenced by the curse of knowledge, a cognitive bias that causes experts to underestimate the challenges faced by learners due to their own in-depth understanding of the subject. This bias can hinder effective knowledge transfer and pedagogical effectiveness, and may be exacerbated by inadequate instructor-student communication. To encourage more effective feedback and promote empathy, we introduce TSConnect, a bias-aware, adaptable interactive MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) learning system, informed by a need-finding survey involving 129 students and 6 instructors. TSConnect integrates instructors, students, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) into a cohesive platform, facilitating diverse and targeted communication channels while addressing previously overlooked information needs. A notable feature is its dynamic knowledge graph, which enhances learning support and fosters a more interconnected educational experience. We conducted a between-subjects user study with 30 students comparing TSConnect to a baseline system. Results indicate that TSConnect significantly encourages students to provide more feedback to instructors. Additionally, interviews with 4 instructors reveal insights into how they interpret and respond to this feedback, potentially leading to improvements in teaching strategies and the development of broader pedagogical skills.
