Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Tools for analyzing the intersection curve between a torus and a quadric through projection and lifting

Laureano Gonzalez-Vega, Jorge Caravantes, Gema M. Diaz-Toca, Mario Fioravanti

TL;DR

The paper tackles the problem of analyzing the real intersection curve between a centered torus and an irreducible quadric by studying its projection (the cutcurve) onto the plane $z=0$ and then lifting points back to 3D. It develops a systematic framework based on resultant and subresultant polynomials, defining the cutcurve via the zero set of $\widehat{{\bf S}_0}$ constrained by silhouette inequalities, and provides explicit lifting rules that depend on $sres_1$ and its companion, enabling reconstruction of the 3D intersection from the 2D projection. The authors establish that ${\bf S}_0=\widehat{{\bf S}_0}/\gcd(\widehat{{\bf S}_0},p_2+q_1^2-2q_0)$ generates the ideal of the cutcurve under generic conditions, relate the cutcurve to silhouette curves, and derive practical computational tools (identities linking $\widetilde{{\bf S}_0}$ with silhouette polynomials) to locate intersection points efficiently. They also distinguish special cases, notably $q_1\equiv0$ vs $q_1\not\equiv0$, addressing tangency, multiple components, and singularities, and provide a suite of examples to illustrate lifting, projection singularities, and the geometry of the intersection. Overall, the work provides a robust algebraic pipeline for projecting, lifting, and characterizing torus–quadric intersections with explicit computational paths and geometric interpretations, useful for CAD/GD applications and qualitative analysis of space curves.

Abstract

This article introduces efficient and user-friendly tools for analyzing the intersection curve between a ringed torus and an irreducible quadric surface. Without loose of generality, it is assumed that the torus is centered at the origin, and its axis of revolution coincides with the $z$-axis. The paper primarily focuses on examining the curve's projection onto the plane $z=0$, referred to as the cutcurve, which is essential for ensuring accurate lifting procedures. Additionally, we provide a detailed characterization of the singularities in both the projection and the intersection curve, as well as the existence of double tangents. A key tool for the analysis is the theory of resultant and subresultant polynomials.

Tools for analyzing the intersection curve between a torus and a quadric through projection and lifting

TL;DR

The paper tackles the problem of analyzing the real intersection curve between a centered torus and an irreducible quadric by studying its projection (the cutcurve) onto the plane and then lifting points back to 3D. It develops a systematic framework based on resultant and subresultant polynomials, defining the cutcurve via the zero set of constrained by silhouette inequalities, and provides explicit lifting rules that depend on and its companion, enabling reconstruction of the 3D intersection from the 2D projection. The authors establish that generates the ideal of the cutcurve under generic conditions, relate the cutcurve to silhouette curves, and derive practical computational tools (identities linking with silhouette polynomials) to locate intersection points efficiently. They also distinguish special cases, notably vs , addressing tangency, multiple components, and singularities, and provide a suite of examples to illustrate lifting, projection singularities, and the geometry of the intersection. Overall, the work provides a robust algebraic pipeline for projecting, lifting, and characterizing torus–quadric intersections with explicit computational paths and geometric interpretations, useful for CAD/GD applications and qualitative analysis of space curves.

Abstract

This article introduces efficient and user-friendly tools for analyzing the intersection curve between a ringed torus and an irreducible quadric surface. Without loose of generality, it is assumed that the torus is centered at the origin, and its axis of revolution coincides with the -axis. The paper primarily focuses on examining the curve's projection onto the plane , referred to as the cutcurve, which is essential for ensuring accurate lifting procedures. Additionally, we provide a detailed characterization of the singularities in both the projection and the intersection curve, as well as the existence of double tangents. A key tool for the analysis is the theory of resultant and subresultant polynomials.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 28 theorems, 78 equations, 14 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: Left: $\Delta_{\cal T}$ (blue), $\Delta_{\cal Q}$ (purple) and the cutcurve (green). Right: The intersection curve defined by two parallel circles (red).
  • Figure 2: Left: $\Delta_{\cal T}$ (blue) and the cutcurve (green). Right: The intersection curve defined by three parallel circles (red).
  • Figure 3: Left: $\Delta_{\cal T}$ (blue), $\Delta_{\cal Q}$ (purple) and the curve defined by ${\bf S}_0(x,y)$ (green) for Example \ref{['curvareal']}. Right: The intersection curve (red).
  • Figure 4: Left: $\Delta_{\cal T}$ (blue), $\Delta_{\cal Q}$ (purple) and the cutcurve (green). Right: The intersection curve (red). For example \ref{['t9-elipse2']}
  • Figure 5: Left: $\Delta_{\cal T}$ (blue), $\Delta_{\cal Q}$ (purple), the cutcurve (green) and the line $q_1=0$ (black) for Example \ref{['toro-8']}. Right: The intersection curve (red).
  • ...and 9 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (69)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Definition 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.5
  • proof
  • ...and 59 more