Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Lax functorialities of the comma construction for $ω$-categories

Dimitri Ara, Léonard Guetta

TL;DR

This work develops a higher-categorical generalization of the Grothendieck construction by framing comma constructions inside Gray $\omega$-categories. It shows that the oplax comma $A \downarrow_C B$ extends to a Gray $\omega$-functor, and that Gray slice categories $\mathbb{C}/c$ exist, enabling coherent handling of higher cones and pasting data. The Grothendieck construction for $\omega$-categories is then defined as a total dual of an oplax comma, yielding a Gray $\omega$-functor that is functorial in both the base category and the diagram; a by-product is a tentative notion of Grothendieck construction for Gray $\omega$-functors. Together, these results provide a unified framework for functoriality of comma and Grothendieck constructions in the setting of strict and Gray $\omega$-categories, with potential applications to higher homotopical properties and type-theoretic models.

Abstract

Motivated by the Grothendieck construction, we study the functorialities of the comma construction for strict $ω$-categories. To state the most general functorialities, we use the language of Gray $ω$-categories, that is, categories enriched in the category of strict $ω$-categories endowed with the oplax Gray tensor product. Our main result is that the comma construction of strict $ω$-categories defines a Gray $ω$-functor, that is, a morphism of Gray $ω$-categories. To makes sense of this statement, we prove that slices of Gray $ω$-categories exist. Coming back to the Grothendieck construction, we propose a definition in terms of the comma construction and, as a consequence, we get that the Grothendieck construction of strict $ω$-categories defines a Gray $ω$-functor. Finally, as a by-product, we get a notion of Grothendieck construction for Gray $ω$-functors, which we plan to investigate in future work.

Lax functorialities of the comma construction for $ω$-categories

TL;DR

This work develops a higher-categorical generalization of the Grothendieck construction by framing comma constructions inside Gray -categories. It shows that the oplax comma extends to a Gray -functor, and that Gray slice categories exist, enabling coherent handling of higher cones and pasting data. The Grothendieck construction for -categories is then defined as a total dual of an oplax comma, yielding a Gray -functor that is functorial in both the base category and the diagram; a by-product is a tentative notion of Grothendieck construction for Gray -functors. Together, these results provide a unified framework for functoriality of comma and Grothendieck constructions in the setting of strict and Gray -categories, with potential applications to higher homotopical properties and type-theoretic models.

Abstract

Motivated by the Grothendieck construction, we study the functorialities of the comma construction for strict -categories. To state the most general functorialities, we use the language of Gray -categories, that is, categories enriched in the category of strict -categories endowed with the oplax Gray tensor product. Our main result is that the comma construction of strict -categories defines a Gray -functor, that is, a morphism of Gray -categories. To makes sense of this statement, we prove that slices of Gray -categories exist. Coming back to the Grothendieck construction, we propose a definition in terms of the comma construction and, as a consequence, we get that the Grothendieck construction of strict -categories defines a Gray -functor. Finally, as a by-product, we get a notion of Grothendieck construction for Gray -functors, which we plan to investigate in future work.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 24 theorems, 261 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $\mathbb{C}$ be a Gray $\omega$-category and let $c$ be an object of $\mathbb{C}$. Then there is a (natural) Gray $\omega$-category $\mathbb{C}\hbox{$/c$}$ of objects of $\mathbb{C}$ over $c$.

Theorems & Definitions (63)

  • Theorem
  • Theorem
  • Corollary
  • Proposition
  • Corollary
  • Example 8
  • Proposition 10
  • proof
  • Remark 11
  • Remark 14
  • ...and 53 more