Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Smoothing effect for third order operators with variable coefficients

Serena Federico, Davide Tramontana

TL;DR

This work develops a robust framework for local smoothing of third-order variable-coefficient dispersive operators by introducing verifiable symbol conditions on the real part and a smallness assumption on the imaginary part. A new Doi-type lemma for order $m\ge 2$ yields the notion of admissible symbols, enabling smoothing estimates (homogeneous and inhomogeneous) and linear/nonlinear well-posedness results for NLIVPs, including derivative nonlinearities in KdV-type settings. The analysis covers both constant and variable coefficient dispersive operators, with extensive examples (KdV-type, ultrahyperbolic, and higher-dimensional generalizations) and a detailed study of non-trapping for strongly elliptic points. The results extend classical smoothing theory for Schrödinger-type equations to third-order variable-coefficient operators, offering tools for applications in KdV-type dynamics and related dispersive systems. The work thus unifies and broadens smoothing, well-posedness, and geometric considerations in a variable-coefficient, higher-order dispersive context.

Abstract

In this work we study the smoothing effect of some variable coefficient operators of the form $D_t-A$, where $A$ is a Weyl-quantized pseudo-differential operator of order $m=2,3$. The class under consideration includes, among others, KdV-type and ultrahyperbolic Schrödinger operators. We prove homogeneous and inhomogeneous smoothing estimates and use them to get well-posedness results for some NLIVPs with derivative nonlinearities. Finally, we investigate the so called non-trapping property of the bicharacteristic curves of the principal symbol of our operators.

Smoothing effect for third order operators with variable coefficients

TL;DR

This work develops a robust framework for local smoothing of third-order variable-coefficient dispersive operators by introducing verifiable symbol conditions on the real part and a smallness assumption on the imaginary part. A new Doi-type lemma for order yields the notion of admissible symbols, enabling smoothing estimates (homogeneous and inhomogeneous) and linear/nonlinear well-posedness results for NLIVPs, including derivative nonlinearities in KdV-type settings. The analysis covers both constant and variable coefficient dispersive operators, with extensive examples (KdV-type, ultrahyperbolic, and higher-dimensional generalizations) and a detailed study of non-trapping for strongly elliptic points. The results extend classical smoothing theory for Schrödinger-type equations to third-order variable-coefficient operators, offering tools for applications in KdV-type dynamics and related dispersive systems. The work thus unifies and broadens smoothing, well-posedness, and geometric considerations in a variable-coefficient, higher-order dispersive context.

Abstract

In this work we study the smoothing effect of some variable coefficient operators of the form , where is a Weyl-quantized pseudo-differential operator of order . The class under consideration includes, among others, KdV-type and ultrahyperbolic Schrödinger operators. We prove homogeneous and inhomogeneous smoothing estimates and use them to get well-posedness results for some NLIVPs with derivative nonlinearities. Finally, we investigate the so called non-trapping property of the bicharacteristic curves of the principal symbol of our operators.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 17 theorems, 209 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $a\in S^m(\mathbb{R}^n)$, with $m=2,3$ be such that cond.a and cond.ima hold with $\lambda(\lvert x\rvert)=\langle x\rangle^{-N}$, where $N\in\mathbb{N}$ and $N>1$. Assume also that $\mathrm{Re}(a)$ satisfies ellderivatives and smallcoeffa2a3 with the same $\lambda(\lvert x\rvert)$. Then, given

Theorems & Definitions (59)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3
  • Theorem 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • Theorem 2.6: Sharp Gå rding and Fefferman-Phong inequality
  • Definition 2.7
  • Definition 2.8
  • ...and 49 more