Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Degenerate parabolic equations in divergence form: fundamental solution and Gaussian bounds

Khalid Baadi

TL;DR

This work analyzes second-order degenerate parabolic equations in divergence form with a spatial $A_2$-weight, linking the existence of a generalized fundamental solution with Gaussian upper bounds to Moser’s $L^2$-$L^{\infty}$ estimates for local weak solutions. By developing a weighted Lions-type embedding, a robust Cauchy problem framework, and off-diagonal decay, the authors establish a sharp equivalence between kernel bounds and solution regularity, including a clear treatment of real-valued coefficients that yields Gaussian lower bounds via Harnack and Nash-type regularity. The results extend previous unweighted and time-independent-coefficient theories to the weighted, possibly time-dependent, and complex-coefficient setting, removing smoothness assumptions on $A$ while preserving Gaussian-type control. Applications touch on fractional parabolic diffusion, anomalous diffusion, and heat kernels in weighted contexts, providing a foundational toolkit for analyzing degenerate parabolic processes in divergence form with measurable coefficients.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider second order degenerate parabolic equations with complex, measurable, and time-dependent coefficients. The degenerate ellipticity is dictated by a spatial $A_2$-weight. We prove that having a generalized fundamental solution with upper Gaussian bounds is equivalent to Moser's $L^2$-$L^\infty$ estimates for local weak solutions. In the special case of real coefficients, Moser's $L^2$-$L^\infty$ estimates are known, which provide an easier proof of Gaussian upper bounds, and a known Harnack inequality is then used to derive Gaussian lower bounds.

Degenerate parabolic equations in divergence form: fundamental solution and Gaussian bounds

TL;DR

This work analyzes second-order degenerate parabolic equations in divergence form with a spatial -weight, linking the existence of a generalized fundamental solution with Gaussian upper bounds to Moser’s - estimates for local weak solutions. By developing a weighted Lions-type embedding, a robust Cauchy problem framework, and off-diagonal decay, the authors establish a sharp equivalence between kernel bounds and solution regularity, including a clear treatment of real-valued coefficients that yields Gaussian lower bounds via Harnack and Nash-type regularity. The results extend previous unweighted and time-independent-coefficient theories to the weighted, possibly time-dependent, and complex-coefficient setting, removing smoothness assumptions on while preserving Gaussian-type control. Applications touch on fractional parabolic diffusion, anomalous diffusion, and heat kernels in weighted contexts, providing a foundational toolkit for analyzing degenerate parabolic processes in divergence form with measurable coefficients.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider second order degenerate parabolic equations with complex, measurable, and time-dependent coefficients. The degenerate ellipticity is dictated by a spatial -weight. We prove that having a generalized fundamental solution with upper Gaussian bounds is equivalent to Moser's - estimates for local weak solutions. In the special case of real coefficients, Moser's - estimates are known, which provide an easier proof of Gaussian upper bounds, and a known Harnack inequality is then used to derive Gaussian lower bounds.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 23 sections, 22 theorems, 173 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

The operator $\mathcal{H}=\partial_t - \omega^{-1}\mathrm{div}_x (A(t,\cdot) \nabla_x )$ has a unique fundamental solution $\Gamma=(\Gamma(t,s))_{t,s \in \mathbb{R}}$. Moreover, the following properties hold.

Theorems & Definitions (52)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2: The degenerate parabolic operator
  • Remark 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • Proposition 3.3
  • Definition 3.4: Fundamental solution for $\mathcal{H}=\partial_t - \omega^{-1}\mathrm{div}_x(A(t,\cdot) \nabla_x)$
  • Theorem 3.5
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.6: Cauchy problem on $(0,\mathfrak{T})$
  • ...and 42 more