Table of Contents
Fetching ...

F-invariant and E-invariant

Peigen Cao

TL;DR

This paper addresses how to obtain mutation-invariant, coordinate-free invariants in cluster algebras and how these invariants relate to representation-theoretic data. It provides a new mutation-invariance proof for the $F$-invariant $(u\mid\mid u')_F$ in the spirit of Derksen–Weyman–Zelevinsky, and shows that this invariant matches the $E$-invariant on cluster monomials, connecting combinatorial and categorical perspectives. A key contribution is proving Reading's conjecture on the separation of non-compatible cluster variables via sign-coherence of $g$-vectors, with implications for when products of cluster variables remain clusters. The results extend to skew-symmetrizable cases and offer a unified framework linking $g$-vectors, $F$-polynomials, and decorated representations in cluster algebras.

Abstract

$F$-invariant for a pair of good elements (e.g. cluster monomials) in cluster algebras is introduced by the author in a previous work. A key feature of $F$-invariant is that it is a coordinate-free invariant, that is, it is mutation invariant under the initial seed mutations. $E$-invariant for a pair of decorated representations of quivers with potentials is introduced by Derksen, Weyman and Zelevinsky, which is also a coordinate-free invariant. The strategies used to show the mutation-invariance of $F$-invariant and $E$-invariant are totally different. In this paper, we give a new proof of the mutation-invariance of $F$-invariant following the strategy used by Derksen, Weyman and Zelevinsky. As a result, we prove that $F$-invariant coincides with $E$-invariant on cluster monomials. We also give a proof of Reading's conjecture, which says that the non-compatible cluster variables in cluster algebras can be separated by the sign-coherence of $g$-vectors.

F-invariant and E-invariant

TL;DR

This paper addresses how to obtain mutation-invariant, coordinate-free invariants in cluster algebras and how these invariants relate to representation-theoretic data. It provides a new mutation-invariance proof for the -invariant in the spirit of Derksen–Weyman–Zelevinsky, and shows that this invariant matches the -invariant on cluster monomials, connecting combinatorial and categorical perspectives. A key contribution is proving Reading's conjecture on the separation of non-compatible cluster variables via sign-coherence of -vectors, with implications for when products of cluster variables remain clusters. The results extend to skew-symmetrizable cases and offer a unified framework linking -vectors, -polynomials, and decorated representations in cluster algebras.

Abstract

-invariant for a pair of good elements (e.g. cluster monomials) in cluster algebras is introduced by the author in a previous work. A key feature of -invariant is that it is a coordinate-free invariant, that is, it is mutation invariant under the initial seed mutations. -invariant for a pair of decorated representations of quivers with potentials is introduced by Derksen, Weyman and Zelevinsky, which is also a coordinate-free invariant. The strategies used to show the mutation-invariance of -invariant and -invariant are totally different. In this paper, we give a new proof of the mutation-invariance of -invariant following the strategy used by Derksen, Weyman and Zelevinsky. As a result, we prove that -invariant coincides with -invariant on cluster monomials. We also give a proof of Reading's conjecture, which says that the non-compatible cluster variables in cluster algebras can be separated by the sign-coherence of -vectors.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 12 theorems, 63 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.4

Let $({\bf x}_{t_0}, B_{t_0})$ be a seed of $\mathcal{A}$. Then any cluster variable $x_{k;t}$ can be written as a Laurent polynomial in $\mathbb Z[x_{1;t_0}^{\pm 1},\ldots,x_{n;t_0}^{\pm 1}]$.

Theorems & Definitions (36)

  • Definition 1.1: $F$-invariant
  • Remark 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Remark 1.6
  • Definition 2.1: Matrix mutation
  • Definition 2.2: Mutation and $Y$-seed mutation
  • Definition 2.3: Cluster pattern, $Y$-pattern and cluster ensemble
  • Theorem 2.4: fz_2002, Laurent phenomenon
  • ...and 26 more