Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Tractable Representations for Convergent Approximation of Distributional HJB Equations

Julie Alhosh, Harley Wiltzer, David Meger

TL;DR

This work addresses tractable approximation of distributional HJB equations in continuous-time reinforcement learning by linking the convergence of distributional statistics to the solution of the DHJB. It introduces the SHJB loss as an objective that remains meaningful when using finite-parameter distribution representations, and proves that, under a mild topological property of the imputation from statistics to distributions, minimizing the SHJB loss yields convergent approximations to the ground-truth return distributions. The authors show that a quantile-based imputation strategy satisfies this property, guaranteeing that the SHJB loss vanishes as the number of quantiles grows, thereby providing a principled and scalable approach to continuous-time distributional RL. This work thereby enables efficient, gradient-based solutions to CTRL with distributional objectives and offers theoretical guarantees for the convergence of learned return distributions to the true distributions.

Abstract

In reinforcement learning (RL), the long-term behavior of decision-making policies is evaluated based on their average returns. Distributional RL has emerged, presenting techniques for learning return distributions, which provide additional statistics for evaluating policies, incorporating risk-sensitive considerations. When the passage of time cannot naturally be divided into discrete time increments, researchers have studied the continuous-time RL (CTRL) problem, where agent states and decisions evolve continuously. In this setting, the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation is well established as the characterization of the expected return, and many solution methods exist. However, the study of distributional RL in the continuous-time setting is in its infancy. Recent work has established a distributional HJB (DHJB) equation, providing the first characterization of return distributions in CTRL. These equations and their solutions are intractable to solve and represent exactly, requiring novel approximation techniques. This work takes strides towards this end, establishing conditions on the method of parameterizing return distributions under which the DHJB equation can be approximately solved. Particularly, we show that under a certain topological property of the mapping between statistics learned by a distributional RL algorithm and corresponding distributions, approximation of these statistics leads to close approximations of the solution of the DHJB equation. Concretely, we demonstrate that the quantile representation common in distributional RL satisfies this topological property, certifying an efficient approximation algorithm for continuous-time distributional RL.

Tractable Representations for Convergent Approximation of Distributional HJB Equations

TL;DR

This work addresses tractable approximation of distributional HJB equations in continuous-time reinforcement learning by linking the convergence of distributional statistics to the solution of the DHJB. It introduces the SHJB loss as an objective that remains meaningful when using finite-parameter distribution representations, and proves that, under a mild topological property of the imputation from statistics to distributions, minimizing the SHJB loss yields convergent approximations to the ground-truth return distributions. The authors show that a quantile-based imputation strategy satisfies this property, guaranteeing that the SHJB loss vanishes as the number of quantiles grows, thereby providing a principled and scalable approach to continuous-time distributional RL. This work thereby enables efficient, gradient-based solutions to CTRL with distributional objectives and offers theoretical guarantees for the convergence of learned return distributions to the true distributions.

Abstract

In reinforcement learning (RL), the long-term behavior of decision-making policies is evaluated based on their average returns. Distributional RL has emerged, presenting techniques for learning return distributions, which provide additional statistics for evaluating policies, incorporating risk-sensitive considerations. When the passage of time cannot naturally be divided into discrete time increments, researchers have studied the continuous-time RL (CTRL) problem, where agent states and decisions evolve continuously. In this setting, the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation is well established as the characterization of the expected return, and many solution methods exist. However, the study of distributional RL in the continuous-time setting is in its infancy. Recent work has established a distributional HJB (DHJB) equation, providing the first characterization of return distributions in CTRL. These equations and their solutions are intractable to solve and represent exactly, requiring novel approximation techniques. This work takes strides towards this end, establishing conditions on the method of parameterizing return distributions under which the DHJB equation can be approximately solved. Particularly, we show that under a certain topological property of the mapping between statistics learned by a distributional RL algorithm and corresponding distributions, approximation of these statistics leads to close approximations of the solution of the DHJB equation. Concretely, we demonstrate that the quantile representation common in distributional RL satisfies this topological property, certifying an efficient approximation algorithm for continuous-time distributional RL.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 5 theorems, 27 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

Under assumptions assumption:1 and assumption:2, for almost every $(x, z)\in\mathcal{X}\times\mathcal{R}$, the DHJB equation holds in the distributional sense, where

Theorems & Definitions (12)

  • Definition 2.1: Imputation Strategy
  • Definition 2.2: Schwartz Class
  • Definition 2.3: Tempered Distribution
  • Definition 2.4: Statistical Smoothness harley
  • Theorem 2.1: DHJB Equation, harley
  • Theorem 2.2: SHJB Loss, harley
  • Theorem 3.1: Convergence of SHJB Loss
  • proof
  • Theorem 4.1: Convergence of the Quantile Imputation Strategy
  • proof
  • ...and 2 more