Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the $\mathcal R$-boundedness of solution operators for a compressible fluid model of Korteweg type in general domains

Sri Maryani, Miho Murata

TL;DR

The paper addresses the resolvent problem for a compressible Navier-Stokes-Korteweg system with surface tension in general domains. It develops ${\mathcal{R}}$-bounded solution operator families via a localization and parametrix framework, leveraging bent-half-space results and the Weis operator-valued Fourier multiplier theorem to obtain analytic semigroup generation and maximal $L_p$-$L_q$ regularity. This enables robust local solvability theory for the associated nonlinear problem in maximal regularity spaces and provides a pathway to optimal decay and stability analyses. The approach systematically extends known results from the whole space and half-space to uniform $C^3$ domains, including the bent boundary case, by a sequence of reductions and controlled remainder terms, with implications for diffuse-interface fluid models in complex geometries.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a resolvent problem arising from the free boundary problem for the compressible fluid model of the Korteweg type, which is called the Navier-Stokes-Korteweg system, with surface tension in general domains. The Navier-Stokes-Korteweg system describes the liquid-vapor two-phase flow with non-zero thickness phase boundaries, which is often called the diffuse interface model. Our purpose is to show the solution operator families of the resolvent problem are $\mathcal R$-bounded, which gives us the generation of analytic semigroup and the maximal regularity in the $L_p$-in-time and $L_q$-in-space setting by applying the Weis operator valued Fourier multiplier theorem.

On the $\mathcal R$-boundedness of solution operators for a compressible fluid model of Korteweg type in general domains

TL;DR

The paper addresses the resolvent problem for a compressible Navier-Stokes-Korteweg system with surface tension in general domains. It develops -bounded solution operator families via a localization and parametrix framework, leveraging bent-half-space results and the Weis operator-valued Fourier multiplier theorem to obtain analytic semigroup generation and maximal - regularity. This enables robust local solvability theory for the associated nonlinear problem in maximal regularity spaces and provides a pathway to optimal decay and stability analyses. The approach systematically extends known results from the whole space and half-space to uniform domains, including the bent boundary case, by a sequence of reductions and controlled remainder terms, with implications for diffuse-interface fluid models in complex geometries.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a resolvent problem arising from the free boundary problem for the compressible fluid model of the Korteweg type, which is called the Navier-Stokes-Korteweg system, with surface tension in general domains. The Navier-Stokes-Korteweg system describes the liquid-vapor two-phase flow with non-zero thickness phase boundaries, which is often called the diffuse interface model. Our purpose is to show the solution operator families of the resolvent problem are -bounded, which gives us the generation of analytic semigroup and the maximal regularity in the -in-time and -in-space setting by applying the Weis operator valued Fourier multiplier theorem.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 18 theorems, 173 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.3

Let $1<q<\infty$, and let $\Omega$ be a uniform $C^3$-domain. Assume that $\gamma_j$$(j =1, 2, 3, 4)$ satisfies Assumption assumption gamma. Then there exists a constant $\lambda_0 \ge 1$ such that the following assertions hold true: $\thetag1$ For any $\lambda \in {\mathbb C}_{+, \lambda_0}$ there such that for any ${\bold F}=(d, {\bold f}, {\bold g}, k, \zeta) \in X_q(\Omega)$, are unique solu

Theorems & Definitions (27)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Remark 1.3
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3
  • Theorem 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • Theorem 2.6
  • Theorem 2.7
  • Proposition 3.1
  • ...and 17 more