Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Equidistribution of integers represented by standard quadratic form under arithmetic constraints

Yefei Ma

TL;DR

The paper addresses the local equidistribution of integers represented by the standard quadratic form $Q(x)=x_1^2+\cdots+x_d^2$ under arithmetic constraints modulo an odd prime $p$. It constructs weighted theta functions $\theta_f$ and shows they are modular (weight $d/2$) for appropriate congruence subgroups, with cusp-form criteria characterized by vanishing sums over $X_{p,d}(a)$ and $f(0)=0$. By bounding Fourier coefficients of cusp forms and establishing a precise singular-series framework for $r_d(n)$, the author proves that for $d\ge 4$, the representation set $X_d(n)$ becomes locally equidistributed on $p+1$ orbits as $n\to\infty$ (with explicit handling of $a\neq 0$ and $a=0$). This approach adapts Duke’s method for equidistribution on $S^2$ to higher dimensions via the Poisson-sum/cocycle formalism and the metaplectic framework, yielding quantitative, orbit-wise equidistribution results with implications for the distribution of lattice representations under arithmetic constraints.

Abstract

We study the equidistribution of integers of the form $n= x_1^2 + \cdots + x_d^2$ under the arithmetic constraints given by $(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^d$. The first step in addressing this problem is to construct modular forms whose Fourier expansion coefficients correspond to the counting problem over the quadric in $\mathbb{Z}^d$ induced by the standard quadratic form, subject to the aforementioned arithmetic constraints. The weak modular property of these modular forms allows us to use representation theory to identify the congruence subgroup to which our modular forms correspond. We then establish a necessary and sufficient condition for functions on $(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^d$ that defines a cusp form. Finally, we conclude that the equidistribution phenomenon occurs locally on $p+1$ orbits for $d \geq 4$.

Equidistribution of integers represented by standard quadratic form under arithmetic constraints

TL;DR

The paper addresses the local equidistribution of integers represented by the standard quadratic form under arithmetic constraints modulo an odd prime . It constructs weighted theta functions and shows they are modular (weight ) for appropriate congruence subgroups, with cusp-form criteria characterized by vanishing sums over and . By bounding Fourier coefficients of cusp forms and establishing a precise singular-series framework for , the author proves that for , the representation set becomes locally equidistributed on orbits as (with explicit handling of and ). This approach adapts Duke’s method for equidistribution on to higher dimensions via the Poisson-sum/cocycle formalism and the metaplectic framework, yielding quantitative, orbit-wise equidistribution results with implications for the distribution of lattice representations under arithmetic constraints.

Abstract

We study the equidistribution of integers of the form under the arithmetic constraints given by . The first step in addressing this problem is to construct modular forms whose Fourier expansion coefficients correspond to the counting problem over the quadric in induced by the standard quadratic form, subject to the aforementioned arithmetic constraints. The weak modular property of these modular forms allows us to use representation theory to identify the congruence subgroup to which our modular forms correspond. We then establish a necessary and sufficient condition for functions on that defines a cusp form. Finally, we conclude that the equidistribution phenomenon occurs locally on orbits for .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 27 sections, 49 theorems, 211 equations, 3 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

For $d \geq 4$ and $p$ an odd prime, let $a \in \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$. Then the integral points of $X_d(n)$ are asymptotically equidistributed on $X_{p,d}(n)$ in the following sense.

Theorems & Definitions (111)

  • Remark 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Remark 1.6
  • Theorem 2.1: General Poisson summation formula
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.2: The Poisson summation formula for $\mathbb{R}$
  • proof
  • ...and 101 more