BotUmc: An Uncertainty-Aware Twitter Bot Detection with Multi-view Causal Inference
Tao Yang, Yang Hu, Feihong Lu, Ziwei Zhang, Qingyun Sun, Jianxin Li
TL;DR
BotUmc tackles the problem of low-confidence Twitter bot detection by introducing an uncertainty-aware framework that combines LLM-based knowledge reasoning, interventional multi-view graph learning, and DST-inspired uncertainty quantification. It constructs heterogeneous graphs from text, metadata, and relations, and uses causal interventions to generate diverse environments, enabling robust feature learning with two RGCN views. Uncertainty is quantified through Dirichlet evidence and fused to select the most credible prediction across views, achieving superior performance on Cresci-15, TwiBot-20, and TwiBot-22. The approach improves reliability in bot detection and provides a principled mechanism to reject dubious decisions, with potential for broader multimodal and cross-platform applications.
Abstract
Social bots have become widely known by users of social platforms. To prevent social bots from spreading harmful speech, many novel bot detections are proposed. However, with the evolution of social bots, detection methods struggle to give high-confidence answers for samples. This motivates us to quantify the uncertainty of the outputs, informing the confidence of the results. Therefore, we propose an uncertainty-aware bot detection method to inform the confidence and use the uncertainty score to pick a high-confidence decision from multiple views of a social network under different environments. Specifically, our proposed BotUmc uses LLM to extract information from tweets. Then, we construct a graph based on the extracted information, the original user information, and the user relationship and generate multiple views of the graph by causal interference. Lastly, an uncertainty loss is used to force the model to quantify the uncertainty of results and select the result with low uncertainty in one view as the final decision. Extensive experiments show the superiority of our method.
