Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Lawvere's fourth open problem: Levels in the topos of symmetric simplicial sets

Ryuya Hora, Yuhi Kamio, Yuki Maehara

TL;DR

This work resolves Lawvere's fourth open problem for the presheaf topos $\mathbf{PSh}(\mathbf{F})$ by determining the Aufhebung values for levels in the topos of symmetric sets. The authors develop a graph-theoretic framework based on EZ-decomposition and EZ-congruence, introducing reduction graphs and a propagativity criterion to convert local cycle-fillers into global coskeletality. They prove the sharp bounds that establish $a_{-\infty}=0$, $a_{0}=1$, $a_{1}=2$, $a_{2}=4$, $a_{l}=2l-1$ for $l\ge 3$, and $a_{\infty}=\infty$, matching the known simplicial case for $l\ge 3$. A key innovation is translating combinatorial constraints into the propagation-graph setting, and handling a special case $(n,k)=(1,3)$ separately. The results provide a complete solution to Lawvere's Problem 4 for symmetric sets and deepen the understanding of level-based dimensions in topos theory.

Abstract

In the topos of simplicial sets, it makes sense to ask the following question about a given natural number $n$: what is the minimum value $m$ such that $n$-skeletality implies $m$-coskeletality? This is an instance of the Aufhebung relation in the sense of Lawvere, who introduced this notion for an arbitrary Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{E}$ in place of $\mathbf{sSet}$, and levels/essential subtopoi in place of dimensions. We compute this Aufhebung relation for the topos of symmetric simplicial sets. In particular, we show that it is given by $2l-1$ for the level labelled by $l\geq 3$, which coincides with the previously known case of simplicial sets. This result provides a solution to the fourth of the seven open problems in topos theory posed by Lawvere in 2009.

Lawvere's fourth open problem: Levels in the topos of symmetric simplicial sets

TL;DR

This work resolves Lawvere's fourth open problem for the presheaf topos by determining the Aufhebung values for levels in the topos of symmetric sets. The authors develop a graph-theoretic framework based on EZ-decomposition and EZ-congruence, introducing reduction graphs and a propagativity criterion to convert local cycle-fillers into global coskeletality. They prove the sharp bounds that establish , , , , for , and , matching the known simplicial case for . A key innovation is translating combinatorial constraints into the propagation-graph setting, and handling a special case separately. The results provide a complete solution to Lawvere's Problem 4 for symmetric sets and deepen the understanding of level-based dimensions in topos theory.

Abstract

In the topos of simplicial sets, it makes sense to ask the following question about a given natural number : what is the minimum value such that -skeletality implies -coskeletality? This is an instance of the Aufhebung relation in the sense of Lawvere, who introduced this notion for an arbitrary Grothendieck topos in place of , and levels/essential subtopoi in place of dimensions. We compute this Aufhebung relation for the topos of symmetric simplicial sets. In particular, we show that it is given by for the level labelled by , which coincides with the previously known case of simplicial sets. This result provides a solution to the fourth of the seven open problems in topos theory posed by Lawvere in 2009.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 28 theorems, 46 equations, 8 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 2.2.3

Let $M$ be a symmetric set, $A$ be a non-empty finite set, and $x\in M(A)$ be an $M$-structure. Then $x$ admits an EZ-decomposition. Moreover, for any two EZ-decompositions $(\alpha\colon A \twoheadrightarrow B, y)$ and $(\alpha'\colon A \twoheadrightarrow B', y')$ of $x$, there exists a (necessaril

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: EZ-congruence and EZ-decomposition: A $7$-vertex graph $x$ with mass $4$.
  • Figure 2: A filler of a $6$-cycle in $\mathrm{Graph}$
  • Figure 3: An example of a propagative graph
  • Figure 4: Bipartite graphs are never propagative.
  • Figure 5: Illustration for $n=7, m=3$.
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (80)

  • Definition 2.1.1
  • Example 2.1.2: Graphs
  • Example 2.1.3: Equivalence relations
  • Example 2.1.4: Representable symmetric set $=$ colouring
  • Definition 2.2.1: EZ-decomposition
  • Example 2.2.2
  • Proposition 2.2.3: Uniqueness of EZ-decomposition berger2011extension
  • Definition 2.2.4: Mass and EZ-congruence
  • Lemma 2.2.5
  • proof
  • ...and 70 more