Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Notes on slalom prediction

Takashi Yamazoe

TL;DR

This work develops a unified framework for slalom prediction and localization by introducing global, local, and infinite localization systems $\mathbf{GLc}(b,h)$, $\mathbf{LLc}(b,h)$, and $\mathbf{ILc}(b,h)$ alongside predictor-based systems $\mathbf{GPr}(b,h)$, $\mathbf{LPr}(b,h)$, $\mathbf{IPr}(b,h)$, and investigates their ZFC-provable relationships. Through Tukey connections, it derives monotonicity, limit behavior as width sequences $h$ grow, and explicit formulas for key cardinals such as $\mathfrak{b}$ and $\mathfrak{d}$ in the various localization regimes, including the $\,\omega$-base cases $\mathfrak{b}^\mathrm{GLc}_{\omega,h}$ and $\mathfrak{d}^\mathrm{GLc}_{\omega,h}$. The paper also analyzes how width-augmentation can invert the relative difficulty of predictions versus localizations, giving conditions under which $\mathfrak{e}^\mathrm{G}_{b,h}$ and $\mathfrak{pr}^\mathrm{G}_{b,h}$ attain their limit values and when $h\to\infty$ yields equality with related localization invariants. By relating these invariants to ideals on the reals (e.g., $\mathcal{N}$, $\mathcal{M}$, $\mathcal{E}$), it clarifies how slalom-based properties interact with additivity/non-additivity and uniformity, including specific results like $\mathop{\mathrm{add}}(\mathcal{NA})=\mathop{\mathrm{non}}(\mathcal{NA})=\minGLc$ and model-dependent separations for $\mathop{\mathrm{non}}(\mathcal{MA})$.

Abstract

We study a concept of evasion and prediction associated with slaloms, called slalom prediction. This article collects ZFC-provable properties on the slalom prediction.

Notes on slalom prediction

TL;DR

This work develops a unified framework for slalom prediction and localization by introducing global, local, and infinite localization systems , , and alongside predictor-based systems , , , and investigates their ZFC-provable relationships. Through Tukey connections, it derives monotonicity, limit behavior as width sequences grow, and explicit formulas for key cardinals such as and in the various localization regimes, including the -base cases and . The paper also analyzes how width-augmentation can invert the relative difficulty of predictions versus localizations, giving conditions under which and attain their limit values and when yields equality with related localization invariants. By relating these invariants to ideals on the reals (e.g., , , ), it clarifies how slalom-based properties interact with additivity/non-additivity and uniformity, including specific results like and model-dependent separations for .

Abstract

We study a concept of evasion and prediction associated with slaloms, called slalom prediction. This article collects ZFC-provable properties on the slalom prediction.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 25 theorems, 7 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

$\mathbf{ILc}(b,h)\preceq_T\mathbf{LLc}(b,h)\preceq_T\mathbf{GLc}(b,h)$ and hence $\mathfrak{b}^\mathrm{GLc}_{b,h}\leq \mathfrak{b}^\mathrm{LLc}_{b,h}\leq\mathfrak{b}^\mathrm{ILc}_{b,h}$ and $\mathfrak{d}^\mathrm{ILc}_{b,h}\leq \mathfrak{d}^\mathrm{LLc}_{b,h}\leq\mathfrak{d}^\mathrm{GLc}_{b,h}$ for

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Diagram of cardinal invariants below $\text{non}(\mathcal{M})$. Here, $b\in(\omega\setminus2)^\omega$ and $h\in\prod b$ go to infinity and $\mathrm{minG}\coloneqq\mathrm{minGLc}=\mathrm{minGPr}_h$, $\mathrm{minL}\coloneqq\mathrm{minLLc}=\mathrm{minLPr}_{h^\prime}$, $\mathrm{supI}\coloneqq\mathrm{supILc}=\mathrm{supIPr}_{h^\prime}$ for $h^\prime\geq 1$.

Theorems & Definitions (48)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Definition 1.3
  • Definition 1.4
  • Definition 1.5
  • Definition 1.6
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Lemma 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5
  • ...and 38 more