Wikipedia in the Era of LLMs: Evolution and Risks
Siming Huang, Yuliang Xu, Mingmeng Geng, Yao Wan, Dongping Chen
TL;DR
This work investigates how Large Language Models influence Wikipedia and the downstream NLP tasks that rely on its content. It combines data analysis of page views, word usage, and linguistic style with simulations of LLM revision to quantify direct impacts, finding modest but observable shifts (often 1–2%) in some categories. It further examines indirect effects on machine translation benchmarks and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), showing that LLM-influenced content can inflate translation scores and reduce RAG accuracy, especially for recent events or when revisions alter key information. The results emphasize the bidirectional coevolution of Wikipedia and LLMs, underscoring the need for careful risk assessment and robust methods to detect and mitigate content contamination in large-scale knowledge sources used by AI systems.
Abstract
In this paper, we present a thorough analysis of the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on Wikipedia, examining the evolution of Wikipedia through existing data and using simulations to explore potential risks. We begin by analyzing page views and article content to study Wikipedia's recent changes and assess the impact of LLMs. Subsequently, we evaluate how LLMs affect various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks related to Wikipedia, including machine translation and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Our findings and simulation results reveal that Wikipedia articles have been influenced by LLMs, with an impact of approximately 1%-2% in certain categories. If the machine translation benchmark based on Wikipedia is influenced by LLMs, the scores of the models may become inflated, and the comparative results among models might shift as well. Moreover, the effectiveness of RAG might decrease if the knowledge base becomes polluted by LLM-generated content. While LLMs have not yet fully changed Wikipedia's language and knowledge structures, we believe that our empirical findings signal the need for careful consideration of potential future risks.
