On the behavior of the Generalized Alignment Index (GALI) method for dissipative systems
Henok Tenaw Moges, Thanos Manos, Ovidiu Racoveanu, Charalampos Skokos
TL;DR
This work extends chaos-detection techniques to dissipative, non-Hamiltonian dynamics by systematically evaluating the Generalized Alignment Index ($GALI$) across continuous-time and discrete-time models. By comparing $GALI$ with the full Lyapunov spectrum in three representative systems—the 3D Lorenz, a 4D Lorenz hyperchaotic system, and a generalized hyperchaotic Hénon map—the authors reveal that $GALI$ can reliably flag chaotic motion and stable fixed points, but has limited discriminative power for distinguishing stable limit cycles from chaotic and hyperchaotic attractors when using higher-order indices. The key finding is that $GALI_2$ often decays exponentially when the two largest Lyapunov exponents differ and may only remain informative when these exponents are nearly equal, while $GALI_k$ with $k>2$ generally decays for all non-fixed attractors, reducing its utility in dissipative contexts. The results provide practical guidance for applying $GALI$ to dissipative systems and highlight the necessity of supplementing $GALI$ with the Lyapunov spectrum for robust attractor identification in non-Hamiltonian dynamics.
Abstract
The behavior of the Generalized Alignment Index (GALI) method has been extensively studied and successfully applied for the detection of chaotic motion in conservative Hamiltonian systems, yet its application to non-Hamiltonian dissipative systems remains relatively unexplored. In this work, we fill this gap by investigating the GALI's ability to identify stable fixed points, stable limit cycles, chaotic (strange) and hyperchaotic attractors in dissipative systems generated by both continuous and discrete time dynamics, and compare its performance to the analysis achieved by the computation of the spectrum of Lyapunov exponents. Through a comprehensive study of three classical dissipative models, namely the 3D Lorenz system, a modified Lorenz 4D hyperchaotic system, and the 3D generalized hyperchaotic Hénon map, we examine GALI's behavior, and possible limitations, in detecting chaotic motion, as well as the presence of different types of attractors occurring in dissipative dynamical systems. We find that the GALI successfully detects chaotic motion, as well as stable fixed points, but it faces difficulties in distinctly discriminating between stable limit cycles, chaotic attractors, and hyperchaotic motion.
