On the stability of the critical $p$-Laplace equation
Giulio Ciraolo, Michele Gatti
TL;DR
This work addresses the stability of perturbations of the critical $p$-Laplacian in $\mathbb{R}^n$ for $1<p<n$ under a non-bubbling energy regime. The authors develop a PDE-centered quantitative framework based on a $P$-function and associated stress tensor to show that any positive weak solution to a perturbed equation, with energy near that of a single bubble and satisfying a normalization $\kappa_0(u)=1$, is close in $\mathcal{D}^{1,p}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ to a $p$-bubble, with a bound controlled by the Sobolev-deficit $\mathrm{def}(u,\kappa)$ raised to a power $\vartheta\in(0,1)$. The proof proceeds via Struwe-type reduction to a single bubble, sharp decay estimates, a differential identity for the $P$-function, a regularized approximation scheme, and a careful construction of a $p$-paraboloid-based approximation that inverts to a bubble; the strategy culminates in transferring these estimates back to $u$ and undoing the symmetry reductions. The paper also discusses optimality, notes an upcoming sharp-exponent result by Liu & Zhang, and applies the stability framework to a quasi-symmetry result, illustrating practical implications for symmetry properties of solutions. Overall, the work extends quantitative bubbling stability from the linear case $p=2$ to the nonlinear $p$-Laplacian setting and provides tools potentially adaptable to anisotropic contexts.
Abstract
For $1<p<n$, it is well-known that non-negative, energy weak solutions to $Δ_p u + u^{p^{\ast}-1} =0$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ are completely classified. Moreover, due to a fundamental result by Struwe and its extensions, this classification is stable up to bubbling. In the present work, we investigate the stability of perturbations of the critical $p$-Laplace equation for any $1<p<n$, under a condition that prevents bubbling. In particular, we show that any solution $u \in \mathcal{D}^{1,p}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ to such a perturbed equation must be quantitatively close to a bubble. This result generalizes a recent work by the first author, together with Figalli and Maggi (Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2018 (2018), no. 21, 6780-6797), in which a sharp quantitative estimate was established for $p=2$. However, our analysis differs completely from theirs and is based on a quantitative $P$-function approach.
