Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On Dynamical System and Topological Transitivity via Ideals

Chhapikul Miah, Shyamapada Modak

TL;DR

The paper develops and analyzes the notion of ideal-based dynamical transitivity, introducing I-transitivity and ideal-non-wandering points to generalize classical topological transitivity and non-wandering concepts. It establishes several equivalent definitions for both standard and ideal transitivity, and corrects a known remark by showing that the equivalence between I-dense, star-dense, and dense requires a completely codense ideal. It proves that I-transitivity implies topological transitivity but not vice versa, and examines the interplay between I-dense and star-dense sets, invariant open sets, and generalized K-open transitivity classes, including a discussion of Hayashi-Samuel spaces and compatibility conditions. The work offers a framework for extending transitivity analyses to ideal-structured topologies, provides illustrative examples and counterexamples, and sets the stage for further exploration of generalized transitivity notions such as beta-, b-, and semi-I-transitivity.

Abstract

This paper will discuss the problem of defining the new topological transitivity. To do this several equivalent topological transitive and non-wandering point has been discussed through this paper. This paper also consider the ideal version of transitivity with the help of the amendment of the result Remark $6.9(2)$ of \cite{LL2013}. Corrected version of the Remark: ``If $\mathcal{\bf I}$ is codense, then $\mathcal{\bf I}$-denseness, $*$-denseness and denseness are equivalent" will be ``If $\mathcal{\bf I}$ is completely codense, then $\mathcal{\bf I}$-denseness, $*$-denseness and denseness are equivalent".

On Dynamical System and Topological Transitivity via Ideals

TL;DR

The paper develops and analyzes the notion of ideal-based dynamical transitivity, introducing I-transitivity and ideal-non-wandering points to generalize classical topological transitivity and non-wandering concepts. It establishes several equivalent definitions for both standard and ideal transitivity, and corrects a known remark by showing that the equivalence between I-dense, star-dense, and dense requires a completely codense ideal. It proves that I-transitivity implies topological transitivity but not vice versa, and examines the interplay between I-dense and star-dense sets, invariant open sets, and generalized K-open transitivity classes, including a discussion of Hayashi-Samuel spaces and compatibility conditions. The work offers a framework for extending transitivity analyses to ideal-structured topologies, provides illustrative examples and counterexamples, and sets the stage for further exploration of generalized transitivity notions such as beta-, b-, and semi-I-transitivity.

Abstract

This paper will discuss the problem of defining the new topological transitivity. To do this several equivalent topological transitive and non-wandering point has been discussed through this paper. This paper also consider the ideal version of transitivity with the help of the amendment of the result Remark of \cite{LL2013}. Corrected version of the Remark: ``If is codense, then -denseness, -denseness and denseness are equivalent" will be ``If is completely codense, then -denseness, -denseness and denseness are equivalent".

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 30 theorems.

Key Result

Lemma 3.1

Let $(X, f)$ be a dynamical system and $\mathcal{B}$ be a basis of the topological space $X$. Then the following are equivalent statements: $(i)$$f$ is topological transitive; $(ii)$ for every pair of non-empty open sets $A$ and $B$, there exists a positive integer $n$ such that $Cl(f^{n}(A))\cap B\

Theorems & Definitions (67)

  • Lemma 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • Lemma 3.3
  • Lemma 3.4
  • Definition 1
  • Example 4.1
  • Example 4.2
  • Example 4.3
  • Example 4.4
  • Theorem 4.1
  • ...and 57 more