On the optimality of convergence conditions for multiscale decompositions in imaging and inverse problems
Simone Rebegoldi, Luca Rondi
TL;DR
The paper investigates when the classical multiscale decomposition for inverse problems converges in the unknowns space, revealing that linear problems with Hilbert-norm regularization guarantee subsequence convergence and improved stability, while purely Banach-norm regularization may fail even in linear settings. It introduces a Parseval-like energy decomposition and dual-characterizations of minimizers in the linear case, connecting to BV–L^2 decompositions. Under Hilbert-norm regularization, convergence to a unique optimal solution is achieved as the scale parameter grows, and numerical experiments on image deblurring confirm stability and accuracy advantages over single-step regularization. However, the authors provide several counterexamples showing that, without Hilbert regularization or a tighter multiscale scheme, the classical procedure can fail to converge, underscoring the practical value of the Hilbert-norm approach for robust convergence in imaging inverse problems.
Abstract
We consider the multiscale procedure developed by Modin, Nachman and Rondi, Adv. Math. (2019), for inverse problems, which was inspired by the multiscale decomposition of images by Tadmor, Nezzar and Vese, Multiscale Model. Simul. (2004). We investigate under which assumptions this classical procedure is enough to have convergence in the unknowns space without resorting to use the tighter multiscale procedure from the same paper. We show that this is the case for linear inverse problems when the regularization is given by the norm of a Hilbert space. Moreover, in this setting the multiscale procedure improves the stability of the reconstruction. On the other hand, we show that, for the classical multiscale procedure, convergence in the unknowns space might fail even for the linear case with a Banach norm as regularization.
