Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Bring Your Own Grasp Generator: Leveraging Robot Grasp Generation for Prosthetic Grasping

Giuseppe Stracquadanio, Federico Vasile, Elisa Maiettini, Nicolò Boccardo, Lorenzo Natale

TL;DR

This paper presents a novel eye-in-hand prosthetic grasping system that initiates the approach-to-grasp action based on user's command and automatically configures the DoFs of a prosthetic hand and compares it with a multi-DoF prosthetic control baseline and finds that the method enables faster grasps, while simplifying the user experience.

Abstract

One of the most important research challenges in upper-limb prosthetics is enhancing the user-prosthesis communication to closely resemble the experience of a natural limb. As prosthetic devices become more complex, users often struggle to control the additional degrees of freedom. In this context, leveraging shared-autonomy principles can significantly improve the usability of these systems. In this paper, we present a novel eye-in-hand prosthetic grasping system that follows these principles. Our system initiates the approach-to-grasp action based on user's command and automatically configures the DoFs of a prosthetic hand. First, it reconstructs the 3D geometry of the target object without the need of a depth camera. Then, it tracks the hand motion during the approach-to-grasp action and finally selects a candidate grasp configuration according to user's intentions. We deploy our system on the Hannes prosthetic hand and test it on able-bodied subjects and amputees to validate its effectiveness. We compare it with a multi-DoF prosthetic control baseline and find that our method enables faster grasps, while simplifying the user experience. Code and demo videos are available online at https://hsp-iit.github.io/byogg/.

Bring Your Own Grasp Generator: Leveraging Robot Grasp Generation for Prosthetic Grasping

TL;DR

This paper presents a novel eye-in-hand prosthetic grasping system that initiates the approach-to-grasp action based on user's command and automatically configures the DoFs of a prosthetic hand and compares it with a multi-DoF prosthetic control baseline and finds that the method enables faster grasps, while simplifying the user experience.

Abstract

One of the most important research challenges in upper-limb prosthetics is enhancing the user-prosthesis communication to closely resemble the experience of a natural limb. As prosthetic devices become more complex, users often struggle to control the additional degrees of freedom. In this context, leveraging shared-autonomy principles can significantly improve the usability of these systems. In this paper, we present a novel eye-in-hand prosthetic grasping system that follows these principles. Our system initiates the approach-to-grasp action based on user's command and automatically configures the DoFs of a prosthetic hand. First, it reconstructs the 3D geometry of the target object without the need of a depth camera. Then, it tracks the hand motion during the approach-to-grasp action and finally selects a candidate grasp configuration according to user's intentions. We deploy our system on the Hannes prosthetic hand and test it on able-bodied subjects and amputees to validate its effectiveness. We compare it with a multi-DoF prosthetic control baseline and find that our method enables faster grasps, while simplifying the user experience. Code and demo videos are available online at https://hsp-iit.github.io/byogg/.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 23 sections, 5 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: The phases of our grasping pipeline. A demonstration of semi-autonomous grasp is shown through the user perspective.
  • Figure 2: Details of our grasping pipeline. (1) A depth $D_0$ is estimated from the first frame of the grasping sequence. (2) $D_0$ is used to build the point cloud $PCD_0$ and generate a distribution of grasp poses. (3) The hand-trajectory is estimated by a visual odometry module, and used to select a grasp candidate. (4) The candidate pose is mapped to Hannes.
  • Figure 3: AGT and GSR measured on able-bodied subjects. Statistics are shown per object (a) and per subject (b).
  • Figure 4: AGT and GSR measured on amputees. Results with our method are compared with CC-SSC and B-SSC baselines.
  • Figure 5: Distributions of pupil diameter (PD) recorded while performing trials.