Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Surfaces with Commuting Boundary Laplacian and Dirichlet-to-Neumann Map

Romain Speciel

TL;DR

The study characterizes when the boundary Laplacian commutes with the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for compact 2D manifolds with boundary. By exploiting the conformal covariance of the Laplacian in dimension two and reducing to boundary Fourier data via a Riemann mapping, the authors show that commutativity enforces a finite Fourier support on the reciprocal conformal factor, yielding a complete classification for genus zero or multiple boundary components: $M$ is $\sigma$-isometric to a disc, a logarithmic oval, or a flat cylinder. A striking outcome is the existence of a one-parameter family of planar domains—the logarithmic ovals—that satisfy the commuting property, and the results sharpen GKLP22 by removing the boundary-connectedness assumption and clarifying the doubly connected case. An open problem remains for manifolds with genus $g>0$ and exactly two boundary components. All mathematical notation is kept within $...$ delimiters.

Abstract

For $M\subset \mathbb{R}^{d\geq 3}$ a smooth, connected, compact $d$-dimensional submanifold with boundary, equipped with the standard metric, the Laplacian on $\partial M$ is known to commute with the corresponding Dirichlet-to-Neumann map if and only if $M$ is a ball. In this paper, we investigate the $d=2$ case and show that, surprisingly, there exists a one-parameter family of submanifolds of $\mathbb{R}^2$ as above for which the boundary Laplacian and the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map commute, thus answering an open problem posed by Girouard, Karpukhin, Levitin, and Polterovich. We then classify all such Riemannian surfaces of genus $0$ or whose boundary has $k\geq 3$ connected components.

Surfaces with Commuting Boundary Laplacian and Dirichlet-to-Neumann Map

TL;DR

The study characterizes when the boundary Laplacian commutes with the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for compact 2D manifolds with boundary. By exploiting the conformal covariance of the Laplacian in dimension two and reducing to boundary Fourier data via a Riemann mapping, the authors show that commutativity enforces a finite Fourier support on the reciprocal conformal factor, yielding a complete classification for genus zero or multiple boundary components: is -isometric to a disc, a logarithmic oval, or a flat cylinder. A striking outcome is the existence of a one-parameter family of planar domains—the logarithmic ovals—that satisfy the commuting property, and the results sharpen GKLP22 by removing the boundary-connectedness assumption and clarifying the doubly connected case. An open problem remains for manifolds with genus and exactly two boundary components. All mathematical notation is kept within delimiters.

Abstract

For a smooth, connected, compact -dimensional submanifold with boundary, equipped with the standard metric, the Laplacian on is known to commute with the corresponding Dirichlet-to-Neumann map if and only if is a ball. In this paper, we investigate the case and show that, surprisingly, there exists a one-parameter family of submanifolds of as above for which the boundary Laplacian and the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map commute, thus answering an open problem posed by Girouard, Karpukhin, Levitin, and Polterovich. We then classify all such Riemannian surfaces of genus or whose boundary has connected components.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 sections, 7 theorems, 35 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.9

Let $M$ be a smooth, connected, oriented, compact Riemannian surface with nonempty boundary. Suppose further that $M$ is either of genus $0$ or that $\partial M$ has $k\geq 3$ connected components. Then, $[\Delta_{\partial M},\Lambda]=0$ if and only if $M$ is $\sigma$-isometric to a disc, a logarith

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Two non-disc planar domains with commuting Dirichlet-to-Neumann map and boundary Laplacian.
  • Figure 2: Constructing a graph from the nodal set of $u_2$.

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Example 1.3
  • Definition 1.8
  • Theorem 1.9
  • Corollary 1.10
  • Theorem 1.11
  • Proposition 2.6
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.15: Fejér-Riesz Theorem, 1916
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['thm: main theorem']} in the simply connected case
  • ...and 7 more