XAIxArts Manifesto: Explainable AI for the Arts
Nick Bryan-Kinns, Shuoyang Jasper Zheng, Francisco Castro, Makayla Lewis, Jia-Rey Chang, Gabriel Vigliensoni, Terence Broad, Michael Clemens, Elizabeth Wilson
TL;DR
The paper critiques the technocentric focus of current XAI explanations and proposes the XAIxArts manifesto to reframe explainability through arts practice and inclusive community critique. It describes the manifesto’s development via a 39-person international workshop (with 11 submissions) and a World Café-inspired, living manifesto process that culminates in XAIxArts 1.0. The manifesto articulates four guiding themes—Empowerment/Inclusion/Fairness, Valuing Artistic Practice, Hacking and Glitches, and Openness—with concrete actions such as inclusive design, artist residencies, open datasets/tools, and embracing glitches as creative material. The work promotes ongoing, open participation, accessibility, and cross-disciplinary collaboration to broaden XAI beyond technocentric discourses and to foster responsible, human-centered AI in the arts.
Abstract
Explainable AI (XAI) is concerned with how to make AI models more understandable to people. To date these explanations have predominantly been technocentric - mechanistic or productivity oriented. This paper introduces the Explainable AI for the Arts (XAIxArts) manifesto to provoke new ways of thinking about explainability and AI beyond technocentric discourses. Manifestos offer a means to communicate ideas, amplify unheard voices, and foster reflection on practice. To supports the co-creation and revision of the XAIxArts manifesto we combine a World Café style discussion format with a living manifesto to question four core themes: 1) Empowerment, Inclusion, and Fairness; 2) Valuing Artistic Practice; 3) Hacking and Glitches; and 4) Openness. Through our interactive living manifesto experience we invite participants to actively engage in shaping this XIAxArts vision within the CHI community and beyond.
