Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Sub-elliptic diffusions on compact groups via Dirichlet form perturbation

Qi Hou, Laurent Saloff-Coste

TL;DR

The paper extends finite-dimensional sub-elliptic theory to infinite-dimensional compact groups by relating intrinsic distances and Dirichlet forms of two left-invariant (sub-)Laplacians. It proves that a distance comparison $d_L\le C(d_Δ)^c$ together with CK$λ$ bounds for $Δ$ implies fractional Dirichlet-form domination of $Δ^{ε}$ by $L$, enabling transfer of heat-kernel properties from $Δ$ to $L$. Under precise conditions, it yields CK$γ$ bounds and Gaussian-type upper bounds for the heat kernel of $L$, along with corollaries such as a parabolic Harnack principle and CK$0^+$ stability. The paper then provides explicit infinite-dimensional examples on $G=\prod SU(2)$ with detailed coefficient conditions that ensure the distance and Dirichlet-form comparisons, illustrating the applicability to and limitations of the theory in a concrete noncentral, infinite-product setting.

Abstract

This work provides an extension of parts of the classical finite dimensional sub-elliptic theory in the context of infinite dimensional compact connected metrizable groups. Given a well understood and well behaved bi-invariant Laplacian, $Δ$, and a sub-Laplacian, $L$, to which intrinsic distances, $d_Δ$, $d_L$, are naturally attached, we show that a comparison inequality of the form $d_L\le C(d_Δ)^c$ (for some $0<c\le 1$) implies that the Dirichlet form of a fractional power of $Δ$ is dominated by the Dirichlet form associated with $L$. We use this result to show that, under additional assumptions, certain good properties of the heat kernel for $Δ$ are then passed to the heat kernel associated with $L$. Explicit examples on the infinite product of copies of $SU(2)$ are discussed to illustrate these results.

Sub-elliptic diffusions on compact groups via Dirichlet form perturbation

TL;DR

The paper extends finite-dimensional sub-elliptic theory to infinite-dimensional compact groups by relating intrinsic distances and Dirichlet forms of two left-invariant (sub-)Laplacians. It proves that a distance comparison together with CK bounds for implies fractional Dirichlet-form domination of by , enabling transfer of heat-kernel properties from to . Under precise conditions, it yields CK bounds and Gaussian-type upper bounds for the heat kernel of , along with corollaries such as a parabolic Harnack principle and CK stability. The paper then provides explicit infinite-dimensional examples on with detailed coefficient conditions that ensure the distance and Dirichlet-form comparisons, illustrating the applicability to and limitations of the theory in a concrete noncentral, infinite-product setting.

Abstract

This work provides an extension of parts of the classical finite dimensional sub-elliptic theory in the context of infinite dimensional compact connected metrizable groups. Given a well understood and well behaved bi-invariant Laplacian, , and a sub-Laplacian, , to which intrinsic distances, , , are naturally attached, we show that a comparison inequality of the form (for some ) implies that the Dirichlet form of a fractional power of is dominated by the Dirichlet form associated with . We use this result to show that, under additional assumptions, certain good properties of the heat kernel for are then passed to the heat kernel associated with . Explicit examples on the infinite product of copies of are discussed to illustrate these results.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 6 theorems, 115 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

Let $G$ be a compact connected metrizable group. Let $\Delta$ be a sub-Laplacian on $G$ with associated Gaussian semigroup $(\mu_t^\Delta)_{t>0}$ that satisfies (CK$\lambda$), $0<\lambda<1$. Let $L$ be another sub-Laplacian on $G$. Suppose the associated intrinsic distances $d_\Delta$ and $d_L$ sati where $0<c\leq 1$, $C>0$. Assume further that Then the following two norm comparisons hold. (1) Fo

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of (\ref{['comp1']})
  • Theorem 4.1
  • Remark 4.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 4.3
  • proof
  • ...and 6 more