Table of Contents
Fetching ...

About Hopf braces and crossed products

Ramón González Rodríguez, Brais Ramos Pérez

TL;DR

This work investigates how to construct new Hopf braces from matched pairs and crossed-product constructions within a strict symmetric monoidal category, introducing explicit compatibility criteria that ensure bicrossed and smash-type products yield Hopf braces. It presents two main theorems (mainth2 and mainth) detailing necessary and sufficient conditions, expressed via equations (E1)-(E2) and (C1)-(C3), that extend Agore’s earlier crossed-product results to mixtures of two Hopf braces. The authors apply these criteria to Drinfeld’s Double $D(H)$, showing that $(T(H),D(H))$ is a Hopf brace when $H$ is cocommutative and giving conditions for $(D(H),T(H))$ in other cases, including commutative and non-cocommuttative settings. The results illuminate the interplay between cocommutativity classes and Hopf-brace structures, and establish categorical links between cocommutative Hopf braces and matched-pair data, with implications for factorization problems and quantum Yang–Baxter equation solutions.

Abstract

The present article represents a step forward in the study of the following problem: If $\mathbb{A}=(A_{1},A_{2})$ and $\mathbb{H}=(H_{1},H_{2})$ are Hopf braces in a symmetric monoidal category C such that $(A_{1},H_{1})$ and $(A_{2},H_{2})$ are matched pairs of Hopf algebras, then we want to know under what conditions the pair $(A_{1}\bowtie H_{1},A_{2}\bowtie H_{2})$ constitutes a new Hopf brace. We find such conditions for the pairs $(A_{1}\otimes H_{1},A_{2}\bowtie H_{2})$ and $(A_{1}\bowtie H_{1},A_{2}\sharp H_{2})$ to be Hopf braces, which are particular situations of the general problem described above, and we apply these results to study when the Drinfeld's Double gives rise to a Hopf brace.

About Hopf braces and crossed products

TL;DR

This work investigates how to construct new Hopf braces from matched pairs and crossed-product constructions within a strict symmetric monoidal category, introducing explicit compatibility criteria that ensure bicrossed and smash-type products yield Hopf braces. It presents two main theorems (mainth2 and mainth) detailing necessary and sufficient conditions, expressed via equations (E1)-(E2) and (C1)-(C3), that extend Agore’s earlier crossed-product results to mixtures of two Hopf braces. The authors apply these criteria to Drinfeld’s Double , showing that is a Hopf brace when is cocommutative and giving conditions for in other cases, including commutative and non-cocommuttative settings. The results illuminate the interplay between cocommutativity classes and Hopf-brace structures, and establish categorical links between cocommutative Hopf braces and matched-pair data, with implications for factorization problems and quantum Yang–Baxter equation solutions.

Abstract

The present article represents a step forward in the study of the following problem: If and are Hopf braces in a symmetric monoidal category C such that and are matched pairs of Hopf algebras, then we want to know under what conditions the pair constitutes a new Hopf brace. We find such conditions for the pairs and to be Hopf braces, which are particular situations of the general problem described above, and we apply these results to study when the Drinfeld's Double gives rise to a Hopf brace.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 sections, 17 theorems, 107 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.15

Let $H_{1}=(H,\eta_{H}^{1},\mu_{H}^{1},\varepsilon_{H},\delta_{H},\lambda_{H}^{1})$ and $H_{2}=(H,\eta_{H}^{2},\mu_{H}^{2},\varepsilon_{H},\delta_{H},\lambda_{H}^{2})$ be Hopf algebras in C. Consider the morphism $\Gamma_{H_{1}}$ defined as in def_GammaH1. Then, the following statements are equival

Theorems & Definitions (56)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Definition 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Definition 1.5
  • Definition 1.6
  • Definition 1.7
  • Definition 1.8
  • Definition 1.9
  • Remark 1.10
  • ...and 46 more