Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Managing Federated Learning on Decentralized Infrastructures as a Reputation-based Collaborative Workflow

Yuandou Wang, Zhiming Zhao

TL;DR

This paper addresses the challenge of managing Federated Learning on decentralized infrastructures with heterogeneous and potentially untrustworthy participants. It proposes a reputation‑based collaborative workflow that combines open workflow standards (CWL), blockchain‑enabled smart contracts, and contract theory to automate FL pipelines, incentivize high‑quality contributions, and maintain reliable training despite attacks. A dynamic reputation system, committee selection, and a multidimensional contract framework are developed to align incentives, penalize misbehavior, and optimize rewards, with theoretical analysis and extensive simulations validating fairness and robustness. The work demonstrates that encoding FL operations as FAIR CWL workflows and enforcing contracts on a blockchain can enable scalable, secure, and fair decentralized FL deployments, with future work focusing on real‑world on‑chain/off‑chain demonstrations and smart‑contract implementations.

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) has recently emerged as a collaborative learning paradigm that can train a global model among distributed participants without raw data exchange to satisfy varying requirements. However, there remain several challenges in managing FL in a decentralized environment, where potential candidates exhibit varying motivation levels and reliability in the FL process management: 1) reconfiguring and automating diverse FL workflows are challenging, 2) difficulty in incentivizing potential candidates with high-quality data and high-performance computing to join the FL, and 3) difficulty in ensuring reliable system operations, which may be vulnerable to various malicious attacks from FL participants. To address these challenges, we focus on the workflow-based methods to automate diverse FL pipelines and propose a novel approach to facilitate reliable FL system operations with robust mechanism design and blockchain technology by considering a contribution model, fair committee selection, dynamic reputation updates, reward and penalty methods, and contract theory. Moreover, we study the optimality of contracts to guide the design and implementation of smart contracts that can be deployed in blockchain networks. We perform theoretical analysis and conduct extensive simulation experiments to validate the proposed approach. The results show that our incentive mechanisms are feasible and can achieve fairness in reward allocation in unreliable environment settings.

Managing Federated Learning on Decentralized Infrastructures as a Reputation-based Collaborative Workflow

TL;DR

This paper addresses the challenge of managing Federated Learning on decentralized infrastructures with heterogeneous and potentially untrustworthy participants. It proposes a reputation‑based collaborative workflow that combines open workflow standards (CWL), blockchain‑enabled smart contracts, and contract theory to automate FL pipelines, incentivize high‑quality contributions, and maintain reliable training despite attacks. A dynamic reputation system, committee selection, and a multidimensional contract framework are developed to align incentives, penalize misbehavior, and optimize rewards, with theoretical analysis and extensive simulations validating fairness and robustness. The work demonstrates that encoding FL operations as FAIR CWL workflows and enforcing contracts on a blockchain can enable scalable, secure, and fair decentralized FL deployments, with future work focusing on real‑world on‑chain/off‑chain demonstrations and smart‑contract implementations.

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) has recently emerged as a collaborative learning paradigm that can train a global model among distributed participants without raw data exchange to satisfy varying requirements. However, there remain several challenges in managing FL in a decentralized environment, where potential candidates exhibit varying motivation levels and reliability in the FL process management: 1) reconfiguring and automating diverse FL workflows are challenging, 2) difficulty in incentivizing potential candidates with high-quality data and high-performance computing to join the FL, and 3) difficulty in ensuring reliable system operations, which may be vulnerable to various malicious attacks from FL participants. To address these challenges, we focus on the workflow-based methods to automate diverse FL pipelines and propose a novel approach to facilitate reliable FL system operations with robust mechanism design and blockchain technology by considering a contribution model, fair committee selection, dynamic reputation updates, reward and penalty methods, and contract theory. Moreover, we study the optimality of contracts to guide the design and implementation of smart contracts that can be deployed in blockchain networks. We perform theoretical analysis and conduct extensive simulation experiments to validate the proposed approach. The results show that our incentive mechanisms are feasible and can achieve fairness in reward allocation in unreliable environment settings.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 25 equations, 7 figures, 2 tables, 1 algorithm.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: An overview of diverse FL design choices. FL topologies. (a) Centralized FL: a central aggregation server manages the training process by coordinating iterative training rounds. (b) Hierarchical FL: typically, the FL network has a tree structure with at least three tiers. (c) Decentralized FL: each training node is connected to one or more peers and aggregation happens on the selected node. FL model updates' paths. (d) Sequential. (e) Parallel. (f) Peer to Peer.
  • Figure 2: Snippet of the CWL workflow.
  • Figure 3: The screenshot of the visualized FL workflow in the CWL viewer with detailed license, specification, and metadata.
  • Figure 4: This is an overview of the system for FL applications. A local virtual research environment enables a user to develop ML models on-premise and unlocks the potential of establishing robust collaboration in a decentralized environment via ❶ ❷ and ❸. It consists of two main interfaces: 1) via blockchain interfaces, users can access to the blockchain network to call for collaboration, make an agreement, and evaluate local updates on-chain; 2) via workflow runtime interfaces, users can create ML models, customize FL workflows, operate collaborative workflows on decentralized infrastructure.
  • Figure 5: Flowchart of FL system operations per round.
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (2)

  • Definition 1: Individual Rationality (IR)
  • Definition 2: Incentive Compatibility (IC)