Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A laplace duality for integration

Jean B Lasserre

TL;DR

Problem: compute the univariate integral $v(y)=\int_{K_y} f(\mathbf{x})\,d\mathbf{x}$ with $K_y=\{\mathbf{x}: g(\mathbf{x})\le y\}$, where $g$ is nonnegative and $K_y$ is compact. Approach: develop a Laplace-transform based duality that yields a 'Laplace dual variable' $\lambda_y>0$ satisfying $v(y)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^d} f(\mathbf{x}) e^{-\lambda_y g(\mathbf{x})}\,d\mathbf{x}$, effectively tilting the measure from $K_y$ to $\mathbb{R}^d$. Key results: (i) existence of $\lambda_y$ under mild conditions; (ii) when $f,g$ are positively homogeneous of degrees $d_f,d_g$, $y\lambda_y=(\Gamma(1+(d+d_f)/d_g))^{d_g/(d+d_f)}$ and a decomposition $f=\sum f_k$ yields $v(y)=\sum_k \int f_k e^{-\lambda_{y,k} g}$ with explicit $\lambda_{y,k}$. Significance: provides a duality parallel to Legendre-Fenchel duality in optimization, enabling practical computation via Gaussian-like cubatures and offering explicit forms in the homogeneous and quadratic cases.

Abstract

We consider the integral v(y) = Ky f (x)dx on a domain Ky = {x $\in$ R d\,: g(x) $\le$ y}, where g is nonnegative and Ky is compact for all y $\in$ [0, +$\infty$). Under some assumptions, we show that for every y $\in$ (0, $\infty$) there exists a distinguished scalar $λ$y $\in$ (0, +$\infty$) such that which is the counterpart analogue for integration of Lagrangian duality for optimization. A crucial ingredient is the Laplace transform, the analogue for integration of Legendre-Fenchel transform in optimization. In particular, if both f and g are positively homogeneous then $λ$y is a simple explicitly rational function of y. In addition if g is quadratic form then computing v(y) reduces to computing the integral of f with respect to a specific Gaussian measure for which exact and approximate numerical methods (e.g. cubatures) are available.

A laplace duality for integration

TL;DR

Problem: compute the univariate integral with , where is nonnegative and is compact. Approach: develop a Laplace-transform based duality that yields a 'Laplace dual variable' satisfying , effectively tilting the measure from to . Key results: (i) existence of under mild conditions; (ii) when are positively homogeneous of degrees , and a decomposition yields with explicit . Significance: provides a duality parallel to Legendre-Fenchel duality in optimization, enabling practical computation via Gaussian-like cubatures and offering explicit forms in the homogeneous and quadratic cases.

Abstract

We consider the integral v(y) = Ky f (x)dx on a domain Ky = {x R d\,: g(x) y}, where g is nonnegative and Ky is compact for all y [0, +). Under some assumptions, we show that for every y (0, ) there exists a distinguished scalar y (0, +) such that which is the counterpart analogue for integration of Lagrangian duality for optimization. A crucial ingredient is the Laplace transform, the analogue for integration of Legendre-Fenchel transform in optimization. In particular, if both f and g are positively homogeneous then y is a simple explicitly rational function of y. In addition if g is quadratic form then computing v(y) reduces to computing the integral of f with respect to a specific Gaussian measure for which exact and approximate numerical methods (e.g. cubatures) are available.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 2 theorems, 46 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 2.2

Let Assumption ass-1 hold. (i) Assume that $v$ in def-v is of exponential order $\exp(at)$ for every $a>0$For example if the growth of $v$ is at most polynomial in $y$.. Then for every real $\lambda>0$, (ii) In addition, assume that the set $K_0=\{\,\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^d: g(\mathbf{x})=0\,\}$ has Lebesgue measure zero, and that the Final Value Theorem final-value holds (possibly with $+\infty

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: $K_1$ with $g(\mathbf{x})=x^4+y^4-1.925\,x^2y^2$ (left) and with $g(\mathbf{x})=x^6+y^6-1.925\,x^3y^3$ (right)

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Remark 2.3
  • Example 1
  • Corollary 2.4
  • proof
  • Example 2