Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Asymmetric results about graph homomorphisms

Lior Gishboliner, Eoin Hurley, Yuval Wigderson

TL;DR

The paper investigates asymmetric questions about graph homomorphisms, focusing on when a large F-free graph G can be mapped to a small F-free Γ under weaker or different assumptions on G and Γ. It introduces asymmetric homomorphism thresholds δ_hom(𝓕1;𝓕2) and establishes zero-threshold results in several regimes, notably showing that a 𝓒_{2t+5}-free graph with minimum degree δ|G| admits a homomorphism to a constant-size 𝓒_{2t+1}-free graph. It then studies asymmetric approximate homomorphisms through M_{F,H}(ε), revealing a diverse spectrum: super-exponential, exponential, and linear behavior depending on ℓ in C_ℓ, with a subdivision-based polynomial bound when H→F^{◦◦}. The work combines entropy arguments, the Frieze–Kannan weak regularity lemma, generalized Mycielskians, and high-girth hypergraph constructions to derive upper and lower bounds, and it highlights a double phase transition phenomenon in the bounds. These results enhance understanding of how triangle-freeness and related forbidden configurations can be explained by small, structured graphs, with implications for algorithmic construction and removal-lemma-type tools in asymmetric settings.

Abstract

Many important results in extremal graph theory can be roughly summarised as "if a triangle-free graph $G$ has certain properties, then it has a homomorphism to a triangle-free graph $Γ$ of bounded size". For example, bounds on homomorphism thresholds give such a statement if $G$ has sufficiently high minimum degree, and the approximate homomorphism theorem gives such a statement for all $G$, if one weakens the notion of homomorphism appropriately. In this paper, we study asymmetric versions of these results, where the assumptions on $G$ and $Γ$ need not match. For example, we prove that if $G$ is a graph with odd girth at least $9$ and minimum degree at least $δ|G|$, then $G$ is homomorphic to a triangle-free graph whose size depends only on $δ$. Moreover, the odd girth assumption can be weakened to odd girth at least $7$ if $G$ has bounded VC dimension or bounded domination number. This gives a new and improved proof of a result of Huang et al. We also prove that in the asymmetric approximate homomorphism theorem, the bounds exhibit a rather surprising ``double phase transition'': the bounds are super-exponential if $G$ is only assumed to be triangle-free, they become exponential if $G$ is assumed to have odd girth $7$ or $9$, and become linear if $G$ has odd girth at least $11$. Our proofs use a wide variety of techniques, including entropy arguments, the Frieze--Kannan weak regularity lemma, properties of the generalised Mycielskian construction, and recent work on abundance and the asymmetric removal lemma.

Asymmetric results about graph homomorphisms

TL;DR

The paper investigates asymmetric questions about graph homomorphisms, focusing on when a large F-free graph G can be mapped to a small F-free Γ under weaker or different assumptions on G and Γ. It introduces asymmetric homomorphism thresholds δ_hom(𝓕1;𝓕2) and establishes zero-threshold results in several regimes, notably showing that a 𝓒_{2t+5}-free graph with minimum degree δ|G| admits a homomorphism to a constant-size 𝓒_{2t+1}-free graph. It then studies asymmetric approximate homomorphisms through M_{F,H}(ε), revealing a diverse spectrum: super-exponential, exponential, and linear behavior depending on ℓ in C_ℓ, with a subdivision-based polynomial bound when H→F^{◦◦}. The work combines entropy arguments, the Frieze–Kannan weak regularity lemma, generalized Mycielskians, and high-girth hypergraph constructions to derive upper and lower bounds, and it highlights a double phase transition phenomenon in the bounds. These results enhance understanding of how triangle-freeness and related forbidden configurations can be explained by small, structured graphs, with implications for algorithmic construction and removal-lemma-type tools in asymmetric settings.

Abstract

Many important results in extremal graph theory can be roughly summarised as "if a triangle-free graph has certain properties, then it has a homomorphism to a triangle-free graph of bounded size". For example, bounds on homomorphism thresholds give such a statement if has sufficiently high minimum degree, and the approximate homomorphism theorem gives such a statement for all , if one weakens the notion of homomorphism appropriately. In this paper, we study asymmetric versions of these results, where the assumptions on and need not match. For example, we prove that if is a graph with odd girth at least and minimum degree at least , then is homomorphic to a triangle-free graph whose size depends only on . Moreover, the odd girth assumption can be weakened to odd girth at least if has bounded VC dimension or bounded domination number. This gives a new and improved proof of a result of Huang et al. We also prove that in the asymmetric approximate homomorphism theorem, the bounds exhibit a rather surprising ``double phase transition'': the bounds are super-exponential if is only assumed to be triangle-free, they become exponential if is assumed to have odd girth or , and become linear if has odd girth at least . Our proofs use a wide variety of techniques, including entropy arguments, the Frieze--Kannan weak regularity lemma, properties of the generalised Mycielskian construction, and recent work on abundance and the asymmetric removal lemma.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 23 theorems, 32 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For every $\delta>0$, there exists a triangle-free graph $\Gamma$ such that every triangle-free graph $G$ with minimum degree at least $(\frac{1}{3} + \delta)\lvert G\rvert$ is homomorphic to $\Gamma$.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Illustration of \ref{['con:HG']}
  • Figure 2: An example of a $K_3$-forest
  • Figure 3: The $2$-fold Mycielskian $M_2(C_7)$. Note that this graph is $\mathscr{C}_5$-free, as implied by \ref{['lem:t-fold odd girth']}.

Theorems & Definitions (48)

  • Theorem 1.1: Ł uczak MR2260851
  • Theorem 1.2: Approximate homomorphism theorem
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Conjecture 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Corollary 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7: Graph removal lemma MR519318MR1251840MR1404036
  • Definition 1.8
  • Theorem 1.9
  • Proposition 1.10
  • ...and 38 more