Simulation of Language Evolution under Regulated Social Media Platforms: A Synergistic Approach of Large Language Models and Genetic Algorithms
Jinyu Cai, Yusei Ishimizu, Mingyue Zhang, Munan Li, Jialong Li, Kenji Tei
TL;DR
This paper presents an LLM-driven multi-agent framework to simulate language evolution under regulated social platforms, introducing constraint and expression language strategies and using a genetic-algorithm–driven evolution operated by LLMs. A supervisory agent models platform moderation to enforce rules, enabling adversarial co-evolution between users and regulators. The framework is evaluated in an abstract password game and a realistic illicit-pet-trade scenario, with a 40-participant human study and ablation experiments confirming GA's benefit for long-term adaptation. Results show that increasing dialogue rounds improves unobstructed conversation length and information transmission, though the models exhibit variability and limitations in strategy diversity and ecological realism. The work highlights practical implications for designing moderation-aware simulations and points to future work on fine-tuning for social-media contexts and incorporating broader, multi-user dynamics.
Abstract
Social media platforms frequently impose restrictive policies to moderate user content, prompting the emergence of creative evasion language strategies. This paper presents a multi-agent framework based on Large Language Models (LLMs) to simulate the iterative evolution of language strategies under regulatory constraints. In this framework, participant agents, as social media users, continuously evolve their language expression, while supervisory agents emulate platform-level regulation by assessing policy violations. To achieve a more faithful simulation, we employ a dual design of language strategies (constraint and expression) to differentiate conflicting goals and utilize an LLM-driven GA (Genetic Algorithm) for the selection, mutation, and crossover of language strategies. The framework is evaluated using two distinct scenarios: an abstract password game and a realistic simulated illegal pet trade scenario. Experimental results demonstrate that as the number of dialogue rounds increases, both the number of uninterrupted dialogue turns and the accuracy of information transmission improve significantly. Furthermore, a user study with 40 participants validates the real-world relevance of the generated dialogues and strategies. Moreover, ablation studies validate the importance of the GA, emphasizing its contribution to long-term adaptability and improved overall results.
