Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Square-free powers of Cohen-Macaulay simplicial forests

Kanoy Kumar Das, Amit Roy, Kamalesh Saha

TL;DR

The paper investigates square-free powers $I(\Delta)^{[k]}$ of facet ideals of simplicial forests and proves that if $\Delta$ is a Cohen-Macaulay (CM) simplicial forest, then $R/I(\Delta)^{[k]}$ remains Cohen-Macaulay for all $k\ge1$. Central to the approach is the introduction of a new combinatorial tool, the special leaf, plus grafting and contraction techniques, enabling explicit depth and dimension formulas. Specifically, the authors establish the depth formula $\mathrm{depth}(R/I(\Delta)^{[k]})=|V(\Delta)|-\nu(\Delta)+k-1$ for $1\le k\le \nu(\Delta)$, where $\nu(\Delta)$ is the matching number, and deduce CM for all square-free powers. They also show the normalized depth function $g_{I(\Delta)}(k)$ is nonincreasing in this class. Together, these results extend the CM behavior of square-free powers beyond complete intersections and highlight the rich interplay between combinatorics (matchings, special leaves) and commutative algebra (depth, dimension, CM property).

Abstract

Let $I(Δ)^{[k]}$ denote the $k^{\text{th}}$ square-free power of the facet ideal of a simplicial complex $Δ$ in a polynomial ring $R$. Square-free powers are intimately related to the `Matching Theory' and `Ordinary Powers'. In this article, we show that if $Δ$ is a Cohen-Macaulay simplicial forest, then $R/I(Δ)^{[k]}$ is Cohen-Macaulay for all $k\ge 1$. This result is quite interesting since all ordinary powers of a graded radical ideal can never be Cohen-Macaulay unless it is a complete intersection. To prove the result, we introduce a new combinatorial notion called special leaf, and using this, we provide an explicit combinatorial formula of $\mathrm{depth}(R/I(Δ)^{[k]})$ for all $k\ge 1$, where $Δ$ is a Cohen-Macaulay simplicial forest. As an application, we show that the normalized depth function of a Cohen-Macaulay simplicial forest is nonincreasing.

Square-free powers of Cohen-Macaulay simplicial forests

TL;DR

The paper investigates square-free powers of facet ideals of simplicial forests and proves that if is a Cohen-Macaulay (CM) simplicial forest, then remains Cohen-Macaulay for all . Central to the approach is the introduction of a new combinatorial tool, the special leaf, plus grafting and contraction techniques, enabling explicit depth and dimension formulas. Specifically, the authors establish the depth formula for , where is the matching number, and deduce CM for all square-free powers. They also show the normalized depth function is nonincreasing in this class. Together, these results extend the CM behavior of square-free powers beyond complete intersections and highlight the rich interplay between combinatorics (matchings, special leaves) and commutative algebra (depth, dimension, CM property).

Abstract

Let denote the square-free power of the facet ideal of a simplicial complex in a polynomial ring . Square-free powers are intimately related to the `Matching Theory' and `Ordinary Powers'. In this article, we show that if is a Cohen-Macaulay simplicial forest, then is Cohen-Macaulay for all . This result is quite interesting since all ordinary powers of a graded radical ideal can never be Cohen-Macaulay unless it is a complete intersection. To prove the result, we introduce a new combinatorial notion called special leaf, and using this, we provide an explicit combinatorial formula of for all , where is a Cohen-Macaulay simplicial forest. As an application, we show that the normalized depth function of a Cohen-Macaulay simplicial forest is nonincreasing.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 11 theorems, 34 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.2

Faridi2005 Let $\Delta$ be a simplicial tree, and let $I(\Delta)$ denote its facet ideal in the polynomial ring $R$. Then $R/I(\Delta)$ is Cohen-Macaulay if and only if $\Delta$ is grafted.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Simplicial trees and special leaf
  • Figure 2:

Theorems & Definitions (29)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Remark 2.3
  • Definition 2.4: Good leaf
  • Proposition 2.5
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.6
  • Remark 2.7
  • Definition 2.8: Special leaf
  • Remark 2.9
  • ...and 19 more