Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Flat braid groups, right-angled Artin groups, and commensurability

Anthony Genevois

TL;DR

The paper analyzes flat braid groups $\mathrm{FB}_n$ and their pure versions $\mathrm{PFB}_n$ through the lens of graph products, addressing when these groups are commensurable with or virtually embed as right-angled Artin groups. It develops a toolkit based on IMC generating sets, thick subgroups, and centraliser structure to prove that $\mathrm{PFB}_n$ is not virtually a RAAG for $n=7$ or $n\ge 11$, and uses maximal-product-subgroup rigidity to extend the non-virtual-RAAG result to larger $n$. In contrast, it shows $\mathrm{FB}_7$ is commensurable to the RAAG $A(P_4)$ by relating both to lampraag models and flip manifolds, via common finite-sheeted covers. The work highlights how acylindrical hyperbolicity, centralisers in graph products, and quasi-median geometry can distinguish RAAGs from broader graph-product families, and provides methods potentially applicable to other commensurability problems between RAAGs and Coxeter-type groups.

Abstract

For every $n\geq 1$, the flat braid group $\mathrm{FB}_n$ is an analogue of the braid group $B_n$ that can be described as the fundamental group of the configuration space $$\left\{ \{x_1, \ldots, x_n \} \in \mathbb{R}^n / \mathrm{Sym}(n) \mid \text{there exist at most two indices $i,j$ such that } x_i=x_j \right\}.$$ Alternatively, $\mathrm{FB}_n$ can also be described as the right-angled Coxeter group $C(P_{n-2}^\mathrm{opp})$, where $P_{n-2}^\mathrm{opp}$ denotes the opposite graph of the path $P_{n-2}$ of length $n-2$. In this article, we prove that, for every $n= 7$ or $\geq 11$, $\mathrm{PFB}_n$ is not virtually a right-angled Artin group, disproving a conjecture of Naik, Nanda, and Singh. In the opposite direction, we observe that $\mathrm{FB}_7$ turns out to be commensurable to the right-angled Artin group $A(P_4)$.

Flat braid groups, right-angled Artin groups, and commensurability

TL;DR

The paper analyzes flat braid groups and their pure versions through the lens of graph products, addressing when these groups are commensurable with or virtually embed as right-angled Artin groups. It develops a toolkit based on IMC generating sets, thick subgroups, and centraliser structure to prove that is not virtually a RAAG for or , and uses maximal-product-subgroup rigidity to extend the non-virtual-RAAG result to larger . In contrast, it shows is commensurable to the RAAG by relating both to lampraag models and flip manifolds, via common finite-sheeted covers. The work highlights how acylindrical hyperbolicity, centralisers in graph products, and quasi-median geometry can distinguish RAAGs from broader graph-product families, and provides methods potentially applicable to other commensurability problems between RAAGs and Coxeter-type groups.

Abstract

For every , the flat braid group is an analogue of the braid group that can be described as the fundamental group of the configuration space Alternatively, can also be described as the right-angled Coxeter group , where denotes the opposite graph of the path of length . In this article, we prove that, for every or , is not virtually a right-angled Artin group, disproving a conjecture of Naik, Nanda, and Singh. In the opposite direction, we observe that turns out to be commensurable to the right-angled Artin group .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections, 39 theorems, 42 equations, 7 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.3

For every $n=7$ or $\geq 11$, the pure flat braid group $\mathrm{PFB}_n$ is not virtually a right-angled Artin group.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: A flat braid from $\mathrm{FB}_3$ (namely, $\sigma_1 \sigma_2 \sigma_1$), and the two typical relations between flat braids (namely, $\sigma_1^2=1$ and $\sigma_1\sigma_3= \sigma_3 \sigma_1$.
  • Figure 2: Some hyperplanes in a quasi-median graph.
  • Figure 3: The flip manifold $M_1$ whose fundamental group is $A(\mathbb{L}) \rtimes \mathbb{Z}$.
  • Figure 4: The flip manifold $M_2$ whose fundamental group is $A(P_4)$.
  • Figure 5: The flip manifold $M_0$, a common cover of $M_1$ and $M_2$.
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (74)

  • Conjecture 1.2: MR4739232
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof : Proof of Lemma \ref{['lem:WhenVirtuallyZ']}.
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Corollary 2.4
  • ...and 64 more