Absence of censoring inequalities in random quantum circuits
Daniel Belkin, James Allen, Bryan K. Clark
TL;DR
This work addresses whether censoring inequalities hold for random quantum circuits by constructing a counterexample where deleting gates speeds up achieving an $\epsilon$-approximate $t$-design, specifically for $t=2$. The authors analyze the second-moment operator (moment operator) spectra and relate the subleading eigenvalues $\lambda$ and $\lambda'$ to design accuracy, deriving a depth bound $d \ge 1 + \left\lfloor\dfrac{2 N t \log q}{\log(\lambda/\lambda')}\right\rfloor$ that demonstrates the violation. The results extend to spectral and singular-value gaps and to non-deterministic graph-edge architectures, while showing that deletions of boundary gates can still uphold censoring inequalities. Overall, the paper reveals that local scrambling does not universally dictate global scrambling and that the relationship between local dynamics and global mixing is nuanced, with implications for 1D brickwork designs and scrambling-rate bounds across architectures.
Abstract
Ref. 1 asked whether deleting gates from a random quantum circuit architecture can ever make the architecture a better approximate $t$-design. We show that it can. In particular, we construct a family of architectures such that the approximate $2$-design depth decreases when certain gates are deleted. We also give some intuition for this construction and discuss the relevance of this result to the approximate $t$-design depth of the 1D brickwork. Deleting gates always decreases scrambledness in the short run, but can sometimes cause it to increase in the long run. Finally, we give analogous results for spectral gaps and when deleting edges of interaction graphs.
