Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Critical Assessment of Modern Generative Models' Ability to Replicate Artistic Styles

Andrea Asperti, Franky George, Tiberio Marras, Razvan Ciprian Stricescu, Fabio Zanotti

TL;DR

The paper systematically assesses how well modern generative models replicate historical and contemporary artistic styles using the AI-Pastiche dataset and two user surveys. It compares 12 diffusion-based models across 73 prompts to measure two key dimensions: perceptual authenticity and fidelity to prompts. The findings show that while models can produce convincing, high-quality images, they struggle with faithful stylistic reproduction due to hyperrealism, artifacting, and contextual anachronisms, with performance varying by period and subject. The study contributes a richly annotated dataset, insights into model strengths and failure modes, and directions for improving stylistic coherence and adaptive inference to bridge the gap between surface realism and historical artistic coherence.

Abstract

In recent years, advancements in generative artificial intelligence have led to the development of sophisticated tools capable of mimicking diverse artistic styles, opening new possibilities for digital creativity and artistic expression. This paper presents a critical assessment of the style replication capabilities of contemporary generative models, evaluating their strengths and limitations across multiple dimensions. We examine how effectively these models reproduce traditional artistic styles while maintaining structural integrity and compositional balance in the generated images. The analysis is based on a new large dataset of AI-generated works imitating artistic styles of the past, holding potential for a wide range of applications: the "AI-pastiche" dataset. The study is supported by extensive user surveys, collecting diverse opinions on the dataset and investigation both technical and aesthetic challenges, including the ability to generate outputs that are realistic and visually convincing, the versatility of models in handling a wide range of artistic styles, and the extent to which they adhere to the content and stylistic specifications outlined in prompts. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of generative tools in style replication, offering insights into their technical and artistic limitations, potential advancements in model design and training methodologies, and emerging opportunities for enhancing digital artistry, human-AI collaboration, and the broader creative landscape.

A Critical Assessment of Modern Generative Models' Ability to Replicate Artistic Styles

TL;DR

The paper systematically assesses how well modern generative models replicate historical and contemporary artistic styles using the AI-Pastiche dataset and two user surveys. It compares 12 diffusion-based models across 73 prompts to measure two key dimensions: perceptual authenticity and fidelity to prompts. The findings show that while models can produce convincing, high-quality images, they struggle with faithful stylistic reproduction due to hyperrealism, artifacting, and contextual anachronisms, with performance varying by period and subject. The study contributes a richly annotated dataset, insights into model strengths and failure modes, and directions for improving stylistic coherence and adaptive inference to bridge the gap between surface realism and historical artistic coherence.

Abstract

In recent years, advancements in generative artificial intelligence have led to the development of sophisticated tools capable of mimicking diverse artistic styles, opening new possibilities for digital creativity and artistic expression. This paper presents a critical assessment of the style replication capabilities of contemporary generative models, evaluating their strengths and limitations across multiple dimensions. We examine how effectively these models reproduce traditional artistic styles while maintaining structural integrity and compositional balance in the generated images. The analysis is based on a new large dataset of AI-generated works imitating artistic styles of the past, holding potential for a wide range of applications: the "AI-pastiche" dataset. The study is supported by extensive user surveys, collecting diverse opinions on the dataset and investigation both technical and aesthetic challenges, including the ability to generate outputs that are realistic and visually convincing, the versatility of models in handling a wide range of artistic styles, and the extent to which they adhere to the content and stylistic specifications outlined in prompts. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of generative tools in style replication, offering insights into their technical and artistic limitations, potential advancements in model design and training methodologies, and emerging opportunities for enhancing digital artistry, human-AI collaboration, and the broader creative landscape.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 27 sections, 17 figures, 8 tables.

Figures (17)

  • Figure 1: Confusion matrix
  • Figure 2: Distribution of Misclassification Percentages on AI-Generated Images
  • Figure 3: Examples of convincing AI-generated examples of different Styles and Periods, according to the results of our survey.
  • Figure 4: "Art nouveau" examples. The sketchy nature of the subject specified by the prompt adapted particularly well to the capacities of generative models.
  • Figure 5: Satirical examples.
  • ...and 12 more figures