Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Euclid: Galaxy morphology and photometry from bulge-disc decomposition of Early Release Observations

L. Quilley, V. de Lapparent, M. Baes, M. Bolzonella, I. Damjanov, B. Häußler, F. R. Marleau, A. Nersesian, T. Saifollahi, D. Scott, J. G. Sorce, C. Tortora, M. Urbano, N. Aghanim, B. Altieri, A. Amara, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, C. Baccigalupi, M. Baldi, A. Balestra, S. Bardelli, A. Basset, P. Battaglia, A. Biviano, A. Bonchi, D. Bonino, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, J. Brinchmann, A. Caillat, S. Camera, V. Capobianco, C. Carbone, J. Carretero, S. Casas, M. Castellano, G. Castignani, S. Cavuoti, A. Cimatti, C. Colodro-Conde, G. Congedo, C. J. Conselice, L. Conversi, Y. Copin, F. Courbin, H. M. Courtois, M. Cropper, J. -C. Cuillandre, A. Da Silva, H. Degaudenzi, G. De Lucia, A. M. Di Giorgio, J. Dinis, F. Dubath, C. A. J. Duncan, X. Dupac, S. Dusini, A. Ealet, M. Farina, S. Farrens, F. Faustini, S. Ferriol, S. Fotopoulou, M. Frailis, E. Franceschi, M. Fumana, S. Galeotta, K. George, B. Gillis, C. Giocoli, P. Gómez-Alvarez, A. Grazian, F. Grupp, S. V. H. Haugan, J. Hoar, W. Holmes, F. Hormuth, A. Hornstrup, P. Hudelot, K. Jahnke, M. Jhabvala, E. Keihänen, S. Kermiche, A. Kiessling, M. Kilbinger, B. Kubik, K. Kuijken, M. Kümmel, M. Kunz, H. Kurki-Suonio, R. Laureijs, D. Le Mignant, S. Ligori, P. B. Lilje, V. Lindholm, I. Lloro, G. Mainetti, D. Maino, E. Maiorano, O. Mansutti, O. Marggraf, K. Markovic, M. Martinelli, N. Martinet, F. Marulli, R. Massey, E. Medinaceli, S. Mei, M. Melchior, Y. Mellier, M. Meneghetti, E. Merlin, G. Meylan, A. Mora, M. Moresco, L. Moscardini, R. Nakajima, C. Neissner, R. C. Nichol, S. -M. Niemi, C. Padilla, S. Paltani, F. Pasian, K. Pedersen, W. J. Percival, V. Pettorino, S. Pires, G. Polenta, M. Poncet, L. A. Popa, L. Pozzetti, F. Raison, R. Rebolo, A. Renzi, J. Rhodes, G. Riccio, E. Romelli, M. Roncarelli, E. Rossetti, R. Saglia, Z. Sakr, D. Sapone, B. Sartoris, M. Schirmer, P. Schneider, T. Schrabback, A. Secroun, E. Sefusatti, G. Seidel, S. Serrano, C. Sirignano, G. Sirri, L. Stanco, J. Steinwagner, P. Tallada-Crespí, A. N. Taylor, I. Tereno, R. Toledo-Moreo, F. Torradeflot, I. Tutusaus, L. Valenziano, T. Vassallo, G. Verdoes Kleijn, A. Veropalumbo, Y. Wang, J. Weller, G. Zamorani, E. Zucca, C. Burigana, V. Scottez

TL;DR

This work jointly models the brightness distributions of background galaxies in Euclid’s Perseus Early Release Observations with both single-Sérsic and bulge–disc decompositions, quantifying how morphology-driven biases affect sizes, colours, and photometry. By leveraging SourceXtractor++ and multi-band fits, the authors show that single-Sérsic radii are intermediate between bulge and disc scales and that bulge–disc decomposition provides more reliable measurements of bulges and discs, including rest-frame colours and colour gradients up to redshifts of $z\lesssim0.54$. They document a robust bulge–disc colour dichotomy and disc colour gradients, interpret these in terms of stellar population and dust effects, and highlight implications for cosmic shear and spin-alignment analyses in Euclid. The study underscores the necessity of multi-component morphological modelling for accurate galaxy characterization in large-area, high-resolution surveys and lays groundwork for forward-modeling approaches in future Euclid data releases.

Abstract

The background galaxies in Euclid Early Release Observations images of the Perseus cluster make up a remarkable sample in its combination of 0.57 deg$^2$ area, 25.3 and 23.2 AB mag depth, as well as 0.1" and 0.3" angular resolutions, in optical and near-IR bands, respectively. Towards characterising the history of the Hubble sequence, we perform a morphological analysis of 2445 and 12,786 galaxies with $I_E < 21$ and $I_E < 23$, respectively. We use single-Sérsic profiles and the sums of a Sérsic bulge and an exponential disc to model these galaxies with SourceXtractor++ and analyse their parameters in order to assess their consistencies and discrepancies. The fitted galaxies to $I_E < 21$ span the various Hubble types with ubiquitous bulge and disc components, and a bulge-to-total light ratio B/T taking all values from 0 to 1. The effective radius of the single-Sérsic profile is an intermediate estimate of galaxy size, between the bulge and disc effective radii, depending on B/T. The axis ratio of the single-Sérsic profile is higher than the disc axis ratio, increasingly so with B/T. The model impacts the photometry with -0.08 to 0.01 mag median systematic $I_E$ offsets between single-Sérsic and bulge+disc total magnitudes, and a 0.05 to 0.15 mag dispersion, from low to high B/T. We measure a median 0.3 mag bulge-disk colour difference in rest-frame $M_g - M_i$ that originates from the disc-dominated galaxies, whereas bulge-dominated galaxies have similar median colours of their components. Remarkably, we also measure redder-inside disc colour gradients, based on 5 to 10% systematic variations of disc effective radii between the optical and near-IR bands. This analysis demonstrates the usefulness and limitations of single-Sérsic profile modelling, and the power of bulge-disc decomposition for reliably characterising the morphology of lenticulars and spirals in Euclid images.

Euclid: Galaxy morphology and photometry from bulge-disc decomposition of Early Release Observations

TL;DR

This work jointly models the brightness distributions of background galaxies in Euclid’s Perseus Early Release Observations with both single-Sérsic and bulge–disc decompositions, quantifying how morphology-driven biases affect sizes, colours, and photometry. By leveraging SourceXtractor++ and multi-band fits, the authors show that single-Sérsic radii are intermediate between bulge and disc scales and that bulge–disc decomposition provides more reliable measurements of bulges and discs, including rest-frame colours and colour gradients up to redshifts of . They document a robust bulge–disc colour dichotomy and disc colour gradients, interpret these in terms of stellar population and dust effects, and highlight implications for cosmic shear and spin-alignment analyses in Euclid. The study underscores the necessity of multi-component morphological modelling for accurate galaxy characterization in large-area, high-resolution surveys and lays groundwork for forward-modeling approaches in future Euclid data releases.

Abstract

The background galaxies in Euclid Early Release Observations images of the Perseus cluster make up a remarkable sample in its combination of 0.57 deg area, 25.3 and 23.2 AB mag depth, as well as 0.1" and 0.3" angular resolutions, in optical and near-IR bands, respectively. Towards characterising the history of the Hubble sequence, we perform a morphological analysis of 2445 and 12,786 galaxies with and , respectively. We use single-Sérsic profiles and the sums of a Sérsic bulge and an exponential disc to model these galaxies with SourceXtractor++ and analyse their parameters in order to assess their consistencies and discrepancies. The fitted galaxies to span the various Hubble types with ubiquitous bulge and disc components, and a bulge-to-total light ratio B/T taking all values from 0 to 1. The effective radius of the single-Sérsic profile is an intermediate estimate of galaxy size, between the bulge and disc effective radii, depending on B/T. The axis ratio of the single-Sérsic profile is higher than the disc axis ratio, increasingly so with B/T. The model impacts the photometry with -0.08 to 0.01 mag median systematic offsets between single-Sérsic and bulge+disc total magnitudes, and a 0.05 to 0.15 mag dispersion, from low to high B/T. We measure a median 0.3 mag bulge-disk colour difference in rest-frame that originates from the disc-dominated galaxies, whereas bulge-dominated galaxies have similar median colours of their components. Remarkably, we also measure redder-inside disc colour gradients, based on 5 to 10% systematic variations of disc effective radii between the optical and near-IR bands. This analysis demonstrates the usefulness and limitations of single-Sérsic profile modelling, and the power of bulge-disc decomposition for reliably characterising the morphology of lenticulars and spirals in Euclid images.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 27 sections, 5 equations, 37 figures, 7 tables.

Figures (37)

  • Figure 1: Distribution of the angular radii corresponding to the isophotal areas calculated by SourceXtractor++ on all objects identified as galaxies in the ERO-Perseus field by EROPerseusOverview versus their SExtractor's MAG_AUTO magnitude. All $38\,032$ modelled sources with $\IE\le24.5$ are plotted, as described in Sect. \ref{['sct-source-selection']}.
  • Figure 2: magnitude distribution of the $212\,975$ sources classified as galaxies in the ERO-Perseus field by EROPerseusOverview and labelled as "Detected", compared to the $38\,082$ galaxies fit with the single-Sérsic profile and the bulge-disc decomposition using SourceXtractor++, labelled as "Modelled". The magnitudes of the Detected objects are from the photometric redshift catalogue based on MAG_AUTO photometry using SExtractor, whereas those for the "Modelled" objects are auto_mag photometry calculated with SourceXtractor++.
  • Figure 3: Ratios of the disc-to-bulge effective radii as a function of the ratios of the disc-to-single-Sérsic effective radii, all in the band, for the $2445$ galaxies with $\IE\le21$. In the upper vertical concentration of disc-dominated galaxies (in blue, $B/T\approx0$) and on the right diagonal concentration of bulge-dominated galaxies (in red, $B/T\approx1$), the single-Sérsic effective radius is consistent with that of either a dominating disc or bulge component. The single-Sérsic effective radius of the $74.7\%$ of galaxies in the top-right cone is intermediate between the disc effective radius (the largest) and the bulge effective radius (the smallest), with a smooth gradient in the ratio of the disc to single-Sérsic effective radius, while $B/T$() varies from zero to one. These galaxies are visually indistinguishable from the types in the present-time Hubble sequence, whereas objects in other regions of the diagram are identified as either non-physical bulge-disc modelling, or biased bulge fits due to bars.
  • Figure 4: Correlation between the disc-to-single Sérsic ratio of effective radii relative to the disc-to-bulge ratio of radii (in logarithmic scale) and $B/T$ in the band, for the $1826$ galaxies with $\IE\le21$, verifying $R_\mathrm{e,bulge} < R_\mathrm{e,1p} < R_\mathrm{e,disc}$.
  • Figure 5: Distances between the centres of the single-Sérsic profile and those of the disc and bulge components normalised by the effective radius of the single-Sérsic component $R_\mathrm{e,1p}$ (left), and distances between the bulge and disc centres, normalised by the bulge and disc effective radii (right). Points are colour-coded by $B/T$() of the bulge-disc decomposition for the $2445$ ERO-Perseus field galaxies with $\IE\le21$. As expected, galaxies with a dominant bulge or disc have this component closer than the other one to the centre of the single-Sérsic profile.
  • ...and 32 more figures