Gender Influence on Student Teams' Online Communication in Software Engineering Education
Rita Garcia, Christoph Treude
TL;DR
This study investigates how gender shapes online team communication in Software Engineering education by analyzing Slack interactions and learning gains from eight weeks of Open-Source contributions. Employing a mixed-methods design, the authors link quantitative analyses (Mann-Whitney U tests, QCA, Wilcoxon tests, and Cohen’s ds) with qualitative methods (conversation analysis and NVivo coding) to reveal that women more frequently initiate leadership-related and coordination behaviours, while men show slower responses. Although overall communication frequency does not predict final course grades, team communication correlates with Quiz performance and women exhibit higher reflection scores, suggesting gendered patterns in learning processes. The findings highlight implications for instructional design and interventions to promote equitable collaboration in SE education and point to future work on diversity and inclusion training and broader intersectionality.
Abstract
Collaboration is crucial in Software Engineering (SE), yet factors like gender bias can shape team dynamics and behaviours. This study examines an eight-week project involving 39 SE students across eight teams contributing to GitHub projects. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analysed Slack communications to identify gender differences, comparing how they influence learning gains. We found higher help-seeking and leadership behaviours in the all-woman team, while men responded more slowly. Although communication did not affect final grades, we identified statistical significance correlating communications with students' understanding of software development. With some students putting more effort into collaboration, future work can investigate diversity and inclusion training to balance these efforts. The observed link between team engagement and a higher understanding of software development highlights the potential for teaching strategies that promote help-seeking. These findings could guide efforts to address challenges student SE teams face when using communication platforms and foster more equitable collaborative learning in Software Engineering Education.
