Direct Value Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs with Refined Values
Hongbo Zhang, Han Cui, Guangsheng Bao, Linyi Yang, Jun Wang, Yue Zhang
TL;DR
Direct Value Optimization (DVO) tackles the brittleness of chain-of-thought reasoning in LLMs by using finely grained stepwise value signals rather than human-provided preferences. Framed as a stepwise MDP, DVO interprets the LLM as a soft $Q$-function and trains with a mean-squared-error objective against target values estimated via Monte Carlo Tree Search or an outcome-value predictor. Empirical results on math and commonsense reasoning show DVO consistently surpasses offline preference-based methods across multiple model sizes and benchmarks, including notable gains on GSM8K, MATH, and AGIEval-Math, as well as robust generalization to out-of-domain data. The work demonstrates that value signals provide more informative supervision for reasoning than pairwise preferences, yielding stronger, more stable improvements with fewer training steps.
Abstract
We introduce Direct Value Optimization (DVO), an innovative reinforcement learning framework for enhancing large language models in complex reasoning tasks. Unlike traditional methods relying on preference labels, DVO utilizes value signals at individual reasoning steps, optimizing models via a mean squared error loss. The key benefit of DVO lies in its fine-grained supervision, circumventing the need for labor-intensive human annotations. Target values within the DVO are estimated using either Monte Carlo Tree Search or an outcome value model. Our empirical analysis on both mathematical and commonsense reasoning tasks shows that DVO consistently outperforms existing offline preference optimization techniques, even with fewer training steps. These findings underscore the importance of value signals in advancing reasoning capabilities and highlight DVO as a superior methodology under scenarios lacking explicit human preference information.
