Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Estimating the distances between hyperbolic structures in the moduli space

Atreyee Bhattacharya, Suman Paul, Kashyap Rajeevsarathy

TL;DR

The paper tackles the problem of bounding Weil-Petersson distances between fixed-point submanifolds Fix$(H)$ in Teichmüller space for finite cyclic subgroups of the mapping class group. It develops explicit admissible pants decompositions for irreducible Type 1 actions by leveraging hyperbolic polygons $\mathcal{P}_F$, Bers' constant, and the data-set framework that encodes periodic conjugacy classes, then translates geometric questions into pants-graph combinatorics via Brock's quasi-isometry. A key contribution is a combinatorial encoding of pants decompositions as canonical $2g$-tuples, along with an explicit distance bound in the moduli space: $\hat{d}_{WP}([\mathcal{P}_{F_1}],[\mathcal{P}_{F_2}])\leq K\mathbb{D}([f_1],[f_2])+\epsilon$, where $\mathbb{D}$ measures combinatorial divergence of the associated building blocks. The results bridge hyperbolic geometry, orbifold data, and combinatorial topology of the pants graph, enabling computable coarse-distance estimates between totally geodesic submanifolds in $(\mathrm{Teich}(S_g),\mu_{wp})$.

Abstract

Let $\mathrm{Mod}(S_g)$ be the mapping class group of the closed orientable surface $S_g$ of genus $g\geq 2$. Given a finite subgroup $H$ of $\mathrm{Mod}(S_g)$, let $\mathrm{Fix}(H)$ be the set of all fixed points induced by the action of $H$ on the Teichmüller space $\mathrm{Teich}(S_g)$ of $S_g$. This paper provides a method to estimate the distance between the unique fixed points of certain irreducible cyclic actions on $S_g$. We begin by deriving an explicit description of a pants decomposition of $S_g$, the length of whose curves are bounded above by the Bers' constant. To obtain the estimate, our method then uses the quasi-isometry between $\mathrm{Teich}(S_g)$ and the pants graph $\mathcal{P}(S_g)$.

Estimating the distances between hyperbolic structures in the moduli space

TL;DR

The paper tackles the problem of bounding Weil-Petersson distances between fixed-point submanifolds Fix in Teichmüller space for finite cyclic subgroups of the mapping class group. It develops explicit admissible pants decompositions for irreducible Type 1 actions by leveraging hyperbolic polygons , Bers' constant, and the data-set framework that encodes periodic conjugacy classes, then translates geometric questions into pants-graph combinatorics via Brock's quasi-isometry. A key contribution is a combinatorial encoding of pants decompositions as canonical -tuples, along with an explicit distance bound in the moduli space: , where measures combinatorial divergence of the associated building blocks. The results bridge hyperbolic geometry, orbifold data, and combinatorial topology of the pants graph, enabling computable coarse-distance estimates between totally geodesic submanifolds in .

Abstract

Let be the mapping class group of the closed orientable surface of genus . Given a finite subgroup of , let be the set of all fixed points induced by the action of on the Teichmüller space of . This paper provides a method to estimate the distance between the unique fixed points of certain irreducible cyclic actions on . We begin by deriving an explicit description of a pants decomposition of , the length of whose curves are bounded above by the Bers' constant. To obtain the estimate, our method then uses the quasi-isometry between and the pants graph .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 9 theorems, 28 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 2.2

For $g \geq 1$ and $n \geq 2$, data sets of degree $n$ and genus $g$ correspond to conjugacy classes of $\mathbb{Z}_n$-actions on $S_g$.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Partitioning the hyperbolic structures on $S_2$ realizing the irreducible Type 1 actions of orders $8$ and $10$.
  • Figure 2: Identifying the partitioned pieces of the polygon.

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • Theorem 2.4: PKS
  • Definition 3.1
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 3.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.4
  • ...and 8 more