Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A common approach to singular perturbation and homogenization III: Nonlinear periodic homogenization with localized defects

Lutz Recke

TL;DR

This work develops a unified abstract framework for nonlinear periodic homogenization with localized defects in semilinear elliptic problems. By employing an implicit-function-type theorem tailored to singular perturbations and leveraging maximal regularity in both Sobolev and Sobolev–Morrey spaces, it proves existence, local uniqueness, and $L^ty$-convergence rates of solutions $u_$ to the oscillatory problem toward the homogenized solution $u_0$. The paper constructs explicit approximate solutions using cell-problem correctors and Steklov smoothing, and derives convergence rates $ orm{u_-u_0}_ty=O(^)$ with $>0$ depending on regularity and defect structure; rates can be pushed toward $1/N$ under additional assumptions. Overall, the results provide a robust, general approach to nonlinear periodic homogenization with defects, including precise $L^ty$-error estimates under minimal smoothness assumptions on the data.

Abstract

We consider periodic homogenization with localized defects for semilinear elliptic equations and systems of the type $$ \nabla\cdot\Big(\Big(A(x/\varepsilon)+B(x/\varepsilon)\Big)\nabla u(x)+c(x,u(x)\Big)=d(x,u(x)) \mbox{ in } Ω$$ with Dirichlet boundary conditions. For small $\varepsilon>0$ we show existence of weak solutions $u=u_\varepsilon$ as well as their local uniqueness for $\|u-u_0\|_\infty \approx 0$, where $u_0$ is a given non-degenerate weak solution to the homogenized problem. Moreover, we prove that $\|u_\varepsilon-u_0\|_\infty\to 0$ for $\varepsilon \to 0$, and we estimate the corresponding rate of convergence. Our assumptions are, roughly speaking, as follows: $Ω$ is a bounded Lipschitz domain, $A$, $B$, $c(\cdot,u)$ and $d(\cdot,u)$ are bounded and measurable, $c(x,\cdot)$ and $d(x,\cdot)$ are $C^1$-smooth, $A$ is periodic, and $B$ is a localized defect. Neither global uniqueness is supposed nor growth restriction for $c(x,\cdot)$ or $d(x,\cdot)$. The main tool of the proofs is an abstract result of implicit function theorem type which permits a common approach to nonlinear singular perturbation and homogenization.

A common approach to singular perturbation and homogenization III: Nonlinear periodic homogenization with localized defects

TL;DR

This work develops a unified abstract framework for nonlinear periodic homogenization with localized defects in semilinear elliptic problems. By employing an implicit-function-type theorem tailored to singular perturbations and leveraging maximal regularity in both Sobolev and Sobolev–Morrey spaces, it proves existence, local uniqueness, and -convergence rates of solutions to the oscillatory problem toward the homogenized solution . The paper constructs explicit approximate solutions using cell-problem correctors and Steklov smoothing, and derives convergence rates with depending on regularity and defect structure; rates can be pushed toward under additional assumptions. Overall, the results provide a robust, general approach to nonlinear periodic homogenization with defects, including precise -error estimates under minimal smoothness assumptions on the data.

Abstract

We consider periodic homogenization with localized defects for semilinear elliptic equations and systems of the type with Dirichlet boundary conditions. For small we show existence of weak solutions as well as their local uniqueness for , where is a given non-degenerate weak solution to the homogenized problem. Moreover, we prove that for , and we estimate the corresponding rate of convergence. Our assumptions are, roughly speaking, as follows: is a bounded Lipschitz domain, , , and are bounded and measurable, and are -smooth, is periodic, and is a localized defect. Neither global uniqueness is supposed nor growth restriction for or . The main tool of the proofs is an abstract result of implicit function theorem type which permits a common approach to nonlinear singular perturbation and homogenization.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 16 sections, 16 theorems, 186 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Suppose (Omass1)-(diffass1), and let $u=u_0$ be a weak solution to (hombvp1) such that (linhombvp1) does not have weak solutions $u\not=0$. Then the following is true: (i) There exist $\varepsilon_0>0$ and $\delta>0$ such that for all $\varepsilon \in (0,\varepsilon_0]$ there exists exactly one weak

Theorems & Definitions (34)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Remark 1.6
  • Remark 1.7
  • Remark 1.8
  • Remark 1.9
  • Remark 1.10
  • ...and 24 more