Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The cosmological Mass Varying Neutrino model in the late universe

Olga Avsajanishvili

Abstract

The cosmological Mass Varying Neutrino (MaVaN) model is considered, where the interaction between a fermionic field and a scalar field with a Ratra-Peebles potential via a Yukawa coupling is investigated. Observational constraints on the flat and non-flat MaVaN models, as well as on the standard $Λ$CDM model, are derived from 32 $H(z)$ measurements using MCMC analysis. Comparison with the $Λ$CDM model using the criteria $Δχ^2_{\rm min}$, $AICc$, and $BIC$ shows no statistically significant improvement for MaVaN models. Deviations in the expansion history remain well below $1σ$, indicating that the $H(z)$ data alone do not provide sufficient constraining power to distinguish MaVaN models from the $Λ$CDM model. The non-flat MaVaN model reduces the tension between the $H_0$ value inferred from $H(z)$ data and the Planck CMB measurement from $\sim 2σ$ in the $Λ$CDM framework to $\sim 1.1σ$. The discrepancy with the SH0ES measurement of $H_0$ is also reduced to below $1σ$, primarily due to the large uncertainties of the $H(z)$ data.

The cosmological Mass Varying Neutrino model in the late universe

Abstract

The cosmological Mass Varying Neutrino (MaVaN) model is considered, where the interaction between a fermionic field and a scalar field with a Ratra-Peebles potential via a Yukawa coupling is investigated. Observational constraints on the flat and non-flat MaVaN models, as well as on the standard CDM model, are derived from 32 measurements using MCMC analysis. Comparison with the CDM model using the criteria , , and shows no statistically significant improvement for MaVaN models. Deviations in the expansion history remain well below , indicating that the data alone do not provide sufficient constraining power to distinguish MaVaN models from the CDM model. The non-flat MaVaN model reduces the tension between the value inferred from data and the Planck CMB measurement from in the CDM framework to . The discrepancy with the SH0ES measurement of is also reduced to below , primarily due to the large uncertainties of the data.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 21 equations, 6 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: A three-dimensional representation of the Ratra-Peebles potential for $M=2\cdot 10^{-3}$ eV.
  • Figure 2: The normalized expansion rate of the universe in the flat MaVaN model, taking into account $N_f=3$, for different values of the model parameter $\alpha$.
  • Figure 3: The mutual influence of the sum of neutrino masses and the scalar field Ratra-Peebles potential, for different values of the model parameter $\alpha$.
  • Figure 4: The dependence of the mass of the scalar field with the Ratra-Peebles potential on the model parameter $\alpha$.
  • Figure 5: Best-fit Hubble parameter values $H(z)$, with $1\sigma$, $2\sigma$, and $3\sigma$ confidence regions, and $1\sigma$ error bars for independent and correlated $H(z)$ data in the flat and non-flat MaVaN models, as well as in the standard $\Lambda$CDM model.
  • ...and 1 more figures